ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2015
Towards the Standardized Documentation of E-Cigarette Use in the Electronic Health Record for Population Health Surveillance and Research.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Patient Perspectives on Digital Smoking History Data Collection.CHEST pulmonary · 2025Article
- Assessing healthcare cost changes associated with transitioning away from cigarette smoking using healthcare claims data: an exploratory study among adult male patients with COPD.Harm reduction journal · 2024Article
- The case for routine screening for e-cigarette use in psychiatry.BJPsych bulletin · 2023Article
- How is nicotine vaping product (e-cigarette) use monitored in primary care electronic health records in the United Kingdom? An exploratory analysis of Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).BMC public health · 2023Article
- Integrating a Systematic, Comprehensive E-Cigarette and Vaping Assessment Tool into the Electronic Health Record.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2023Review
- Otolaryngology Resident Education and Perceptions of e-cigarettes.The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2022Article
- Provider documentation of electronic nicotine delivery systems use among patients prescribed contraception at an academic health center in the Southeastern United States.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Article
- Co-creating opportunities to incorporate cessation for electronic nicotine delivery systems in family medicine - a qualitative program evaluation.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Assessing Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Use at NCI-Designated Cancer Centers in the Cancer Moonshot-funded Cancer Center Cessation Initiative.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021Article
- Adolescent Use and Perceptions of JUUL and Other Pod-Style e-Cigarettes: A Qualitative Study to Inform Prevention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Vaping at the VA: Developing an Annotated Corpus of Electronic Cigarette Mentions in Clinical Notes at the Department of Veterans Affairs.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021Article
- Improved Documentation of Electronic Cigarette Use in an Electronic Health Record.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Tobacco-Related Counseling and Documentation in Adolescent Primary Care Practice: Challenges and Opportunities.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020Article
- Cigarette and E-Cigarette Use and Smoking Cessation Practices among Physicians in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Documentation of e-cigarette use and associations with smoking from 2012 to 2015 in an integrated healthcare delivery system.Preventive medicine · 2018Article
- Exploring Physician Attitudes Regarding Electronic Documentation of E-cigarette Use: A Qualitative Study.Tobacco use insights · 2018Article
- Do you vape? Leveraging electronic health records to assess clinician documentation of electronic nicotine delivery system use among adolescents and adults.Preventive medicine · 2017Article
- Challenges with Collecting Smoking Status in Electronic Health Records.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017Article
- Representation of Social History Factors Across Age Groups: A Topic Analysis of Free-Text Social Documentation.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017Article
- Electronic Cigarette Use Among Counseled Tobacco Users Hospitalized in 2015.Journal of addiction medicineObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The debate regarding potential negative health effects of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), which include electronic cigarettes, has received much recent attention. Currently, it is unknown whether ENDS pose a real health risk to users or those passively exposed to their vapor. With the increased use of these devices, the goal of this study was to examine if and how their use is being documented in the electronic health record (EHR) and the associated implications for clinical research. Analysis of five years of progress notes and tobacco use comments revealed that ENDS use is documented at an increasing rate with variable associated information, most often consisting of the status, purpose, and side effects of ENDS use. These results highlight that improved and consistent EHR discrete data entry for ENDS with associated clinical standards for documentation and representation of potential exposures are needed for enabling effective population health surveillance and research.
Identifiers
26306269PMC4525250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.