Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26306267›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2015

Research Data Explorer: Lessons Learned in Design and Development of Context-based Cohort Definition and Selection.

Adam Wilcox, David Vawdrey, Chunhua Weng, Mark Velez, Suzanne Bakken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Cohort Selection and Management Application Leveraging Standards-based Semantic Interoperability and a Groovy DSL.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam WilcoxIntermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT.
David VawdreyColumbia University, New York, NY.
Chunhua WengColumbia University, New York, NY.
Mark VelezColumbia University, New York, NY.
Suzanne BakkenColumbia University, New York, NY.

Funding

Washington Heights Initiative Community-based Comparative Effectiveness ResearchR01HS019853 · AHRQ · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BAKKEN, SUZANNE · 2010 to 2010
$8.9M
Bridging the Semantic Gap Between Research Eligibility Criteria and Clinical DataR01LM009886 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WENG, CHUNHUA · 2009 to 2020
$5.3M
WICER 4UR01HS022961 · AHRQ · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BAKKEN, SUZANNE · 2013 to 2013
$750k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS019853AHRQ HHS R01 HS022961NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research Data eXplorer (RedX) was designed to support self-service research data queries and cohort identification from clinical research databases. The primary innovation of RedX was the electronic health record view of patient data, to provide better contextual understanding for non-technical users in building complex data queries. The design of RedX around this need identified multiple functions that would use individual patient views to better understand population-based data, and vice-versa. During development, the more necessary and valuable components of RedX were refined, leading to a functional self-service query and cohort identification tool. However, with the improved capabilities and extensibility of other applications for data querying and navigation, our long-term implementation and dissemination plans have moved towards consolidation and alignment of RedX functions as enhancements in these other initiatives.

Identifiers

PMID26306267
PMCPMC4525259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.