ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2015
Integrating Gene Regulatory Networks to identify cancer-specific genes.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Consensus approaches have been widely used to identify Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs) that are common to multiple studies. However, in this research we develop an application that semi-automatically identifies key mechanisms that are specific to a particular set of conditions. We analyse four different types of cancer to identify gene pathways unique to each of them. To support the results reliability we calculate the prediction accuracy of each gene for the specified conditions and compare to predictions on other conditions. The most predictive are validated using the GeneCards encyclopaedia1 coupled with a statistical test for validating clusters. Finally, we implement an interface that allows the user to identify unique subnetworks of any selected combination of studies using AND & NOT logic operators. Results show that unique genes and sub-networks can be reliably identified and that they reflect key mechanisms that are fundamental to the cancer types under study.
Identifiers
26306224PMC4525222What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.