Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26306174›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2015

rBEFdata: documenting data exchange and analysis for a collaborative data management platform.

Claas-Thido Pfaff, Birgitta König-Ries, Anne C Lang, Sophia Ratcliffe, Christian Wirth, Xingxing Man, Karin Nadrowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claas-Thido PfaffDepartment of Special Botany and Functional Biodiversity, University of Leipzig Johannisallee 21, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Birgitta König-RiesDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena Ernst-Abbe-Platz 2, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Anne C LangDepartment of Special Botany and Functional Biodiversity, University of Leipzig Johannisallee 21, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Sophia RatcliffeDepartment of Special Botany and Functional Biodiversity, University of Leipzig Johannisallee 21, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian WirthDepartment of Special Botany and Functional Biodiversity, University of Leipzig Johannisallee 21, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Xingxing ManDepartment of Special Botany and Functional Biodiversity, University of Leipzig Johannisallee 21, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Karin NadrowskiDepartment of Special Botany and Functional Biodiversity, University of Leipzig Johannisallee 21, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are witnessing a growing gap separating primary research data from derived data products presented as knowledge in publications. Although journals today more often require the underlying data products used to derive the results as a prerequisite for a publication, the important link to the primary data is lost. However, documenting the postprocessing steps of data linking, the primary data with derived data products has the potential to increase the accuracy and the reproducibility of scientific findings significantly. Here, we introduce the rBEFdata R package as companion to the collaborative data management platform BEFdata. The R package provides programmatic access to features of the platform. It allows to search for data and integrates the search with external thesauri to improve the data discovery. It allows to download and import data and metadata into R for analysis. A batched download is available as well which works along a paper proposal mechanism implemented by BEFdata. This feature of BEFdata allows to group primary data and metadata and streamlines discussions and collaborations revolving around a certain research idea. The upload functionality of the R package in combination with the paper proposal mechanism of the portal allows to attach derived data products and scripts directly from R, thus addressing major aspects of documenting data postprocessing. We present the core features of the rBEFdata R package along an ecological analysis example and further discuss the potential of postprocessing documentation for data, linking primary data with derived data products and knowledge.

Indexed as

Biodiversity ecosystem functioningdata postprocessingdata sharingecological metadata languagemetadataopen scienceopen sourcepaper proposalsRreproducible sciencesemantic integrationworkflow

Identifiers

PMID26306174
PMCPMC4541993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.