Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26306166›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2015

Variation in signal-preference genetic correlations in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).

Kasey D Fowler-Finn, Joseph T Kilmer, Allysa C Hallett, Rafael L Rodríguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kasey D Fowler-FinnBehavioral and Molecular Ecology Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee, Wisconsin ; Department of Biology, Saint Louis University Saint Louis, Missouri.
Joseph T KilmerBehavioral and Molecular Ecology Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Allysa C HallettBehavioral and Molecular Ecology Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Rafael L RodríguezBehavioral and Molecular Ecology Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fisherian selection is a within-population process that promotes signal-preference coevolution and speciation due to signal-preference genetic correlations. The importance of the contribution of Fisherian selection to speciation depends in part on the answer to two outstanding questions: What explains differences in the strength of signal-preference genetic correlations? And, how does the magnitude of within-species signal-preference covariation compare to species differences in signals and preferences? To address these questions, we tested for signal-preference genetic correlations in two members of the Enchenopa binotata complex, a clade of plant-feeding insects wherein speciation involves the colonization of novel host plants and signal-preference divergence. We used a full-sibling, split-family rearing experiment to estimate genetic correlations and to analyze the underlying patterns of variation in signals and preferences. Genetic correlations were weak or zero, but exploration of the underlying patterns of variation in signals and preferences revealed some full-sib families that varied by as much as 50% of the distance between similar species in the E. binotata complex. This result was stronger in the species that showed greater amounts of genetic variation in signals and preferences. We argue that some forms of weak signal-preference genetic correlation may have important evolutionary consequences.

Indexed as

Assortative matingFisher’s runawaymale–female genetic covariancepreference functionvibrational communication

Identifiers

PMID26306166
PMCPMC4541985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.