ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015
Contact-dependent growth inhibition toxins exploit multiple independent cell-entry pathways.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Elongation Factor Tu Acts as a Chaperone to Activate an Antibacterial RNase Toxin.Molecular microbiology · 2026Article
- Bacteria deliver a microtubule-binding protein into mammalian cells to promote colonization.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- The yxiD gene from Bacillus subtilis 6633 encodes a polymorphic toxin with tRNase activity and is neutralized by the cognate immunity protein YxxD.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- A delivered DNase toxin creates population heterogeneity through transient intoxication of siblings.mBio · 2025Article
- The Competitive Edge: T6SS-Mediated Interference Competition byMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- A bacteriolysin of Lactococcus carnosus is potentially involved in mediating contact-dependent antagonism against Listeria monocytogenes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mechanism of activation of contact-dependent growth inhibition tRNase toxin by the amino acid biogenesis factor CysK in the bacterial competition system.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- The dominant lineage of an emerging pathogen harbours contact-dependent inhibition systems.Microbial genomics · 2025Article
- Harnessing the human gut microbiota: an emerging frontier in combatting multidrug-resistant bacteria.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems deploy a large family of polymorphic ionophoric toxins for inter-bacterial competition.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Targeting BAM for Novel Therapeutics against Pathogenic Gram-Negative Bacteria.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Intercepting biological messages: Antibacterial molecules targeting nucleic acids during interbacterial conflicts.Genetics and molecular biology · 2023Article
- Recipient Cell Factors Influence Interbacterial Competition Mediated by Two Distinct Burkholderia dolosa Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems.Journal of bacteriology · 2022Article
- Proteolytic processing induces a conformational switch required for antibacterial toxin delivery.Nature communications · 2022Article
- The Conserved Serine Transporter SdaC Moonlights To Enable Self Recognition.Journal of bacteriology · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial Weapons of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Functional and Structural Diversity of Bacterial Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition Effectors.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Article
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems function to deliver toxins into neighboring bacterial cells. CDI+ bacteria export filamentous CdiA effector proteins, which extend from the inhibitor-cell surface to interact with receptors on neighboring target bacteria. Upon binding its receptor, CdiA delivers a toxin derived from its C-terminal region. CdiA C-terminal (CdiA-CT) sequences are highly variable between bacteria, reflecting the multitude of CDI toxin activities. Here, we show that several CdiA-CT regions are composed of two domains, each with a distinct function during CDI. The C-terminal domain typically possesses toxic nuclease activity, whereas the N-terminal domain appears to control toxin transport into target bacteria. Using genetic approaches, we identified ptsG, metI, rbsC, gltK/gltJ, yciB, and ftsH mutations that confer resistance to specific CdiA-CTs. The resistance mutations all disrupt expression of inner-membrane proteins, suggesting that these proteins are exploited for toxin entry into target cells. Moreover, each mutation only protects against inhibition by a subset of CdiA-CTs that share similar N-terminal domains. We propose that, following delivery of CdiA-CTs into the periplasm, the N-terminal domains bind specific inner-membrane receptors for subsequent translocation into the cytoplasm. In accord with this model, we find that CDI nuclease domains are modular payloads that can be redirected through different import pathways when fused to heterologous N-terminal "translocation domains." These results highlight the plasticity of CDI toxin delivery and suggest that the underlying translocation mechanisms could be harnessed to deliver other antimicrobial agents into Gram-negative bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.