Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26305955›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Contact-dependent growth inhibition toxins exploit multiple independent cell-entry pathways.

Julia L E Willett, Grant C Gucinski, Jackson P Fatherree, David A Low, Christopher S Hayes

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antimicrobial Weapons of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia L E WillettDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93016-9625;
Grant C GucinskiBiomolecular Science and Engineering Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93016-9625.
Jackson P FatherreeDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93016-9625;
David A LowDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93016-9625; Biomolecular Science and Engineering Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93016-9625.
Christopher S HayesDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93016-9625; Biomolecular Science and Engineering Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93016-9625 chayes@lifesci.ucsb.edu.
University of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Structure-function analysis of polymorphic CDI toxin-immunity protein complexes aU01GM102318 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GOULDING, CELIA · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM102318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems function to deliver toxins into neighboring bacterial cells. CDI+ bacteria export filamentous CdiA effector proteins, which extend from the inhibitor-cell surface to interact with receptors on neighboring target bacteria. Upon binding its receptor, CdiA delivers a toxin derived from its C-terminal region. CdiA C-terminal (CdiA-CT) sequences are highly variable between bacteria, reflecting the multitude of CDI toxin activities. Here, we show that several CdiA-CT regions are composed of two domains, each with a distinct function during CDI. The C-terminal domain typically possesses toxic nuclease activity, whereas the N-terminal domain appears to control toxin transport into target bacteria. Using genetic approaches, we identified ptsG, metI, rbsC, gltK/gltJ, yciB, and ftsH mutations that confer resistance to specific CdiA-CTs. The resistance mutations all disrupt expression of inner-membrane proteins, suggesting that these proteins are exploited for toxin entry into target cells. Moreover, each mutation only protects against inhibition by a subset of CdiA-CTs that share similar N-terminal domains. We propose that, following delivery of CdiA-CTs into the periplasm, the N-terminal domains bind specific inner-membrane receptors for subsequent translocation into the cytoplasm. In accord with this model, we find that CDI nuclease domains are modular payloads that can be redirected through different import pathways when fused to heterologous N-terminal "translocation domains." These results highlight the plasticity of CDI toxin delivery and suggest that the underlying translocation mechanisms could be harnessed to deliver other antimicrobial agents into Gram-negative bacteria.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBacterial AdhesionBacterial ToxinsBinding SitesContact InhibitionEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceMolecular Sequence DataMutationProtein TransportSequence Homology, Amino AcidSignal TransductionSpecies SpecificityBacterial ToxinsCdiA protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane Proteinsbacterial cell envelopeDNase activitygenetic selectiontoxin/immunity genestRNase activity

Identifiers

PMID26305955
PMCPMC4568652
OpenAlexW2141221534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.