Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26305938›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Native root-associated bacteria rescue a plant from a sudden-wilt disease that emerged during continuous cropping.

Rakesh Santhanam, Van Thi Luu, Arne Weinhold, Jay Goldberg, Youngjoo Oh, Ian T Baldwin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
36.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 462 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Root colonization by beneficial rhizobacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. mSystems · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rakesh SanthanamDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena 07745, Germany.
Van Thi LuuDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena 07745, Germany.
Arne WeinholdDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena 07745, Germany.
Jay GoldbergDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena 07745, Germany.
Youngjoo OhDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena 07745, Germany.
Ian T BaldwinDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena 07745, Germany Baldwin@ice.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DE

Funding

European Research Council 293926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants maintain microbial associations whose functions remain largely unknown. For the past 15 y, we have planted the annual postfire tobacco Nicotiana attenuata into an experimental field plot in the plant's native habitat, and for the last 8 y the number of plants dying from a sudden wilt disease has increased, leading to crop failure. Inadvertently we had recapitulated the common agricultural dilemma of pathogen buildup associated with continuous cropping for this native plant. Plants suffered sudden tissue collapse and black roots, symptoms similar to a Fusarium-Alternaria disease complex, recently characterized in a nearby native population and developed into an in vitro pathosystem for N. attenuata. With this in vitro disease system, different protection strategies (fungicide and inoculations with native root-associated bacterial and fungal isolates), together with a biochar soil amendment, were tested further in the field. A field trial with more than 900 plants in two field plots revealed that inoculation with a mixture of native bacterial isolates significantly reduced disease incidence and mortality in the infected field plot without influencing growth, herbivore resistance, or 32 defense and signaling metabolites known to mediate resistance against native herbivores. Tests in a subsequent year revealed that a core consortium of five bacteria was essential for disease reduction. This consortium, but not individual members of the root-associated bacteria community which this plant normally recruits during germination from native seed banks, provides enduring resistance against fungal diseases, demonstrating that native plants develop opportunistic mutualisms with prokaryotes that solve context-dependent ecological problems.

Indexed as

AlternariaAntibiosisBacteriaDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFungiFusariumHost-Pathogen InteractionsMicrobial ConsortiaMolecular Sequence DataNicotianaPlant DiseasesPlant RootsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASymbiosisDNA, Ribosomal SpacerRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAlternariaFusariummicrobiome functionNicotiana attenuataplant disease resistance

Identifiers

PMID26305938
PMCPMC4568709
OpenAlexW2114697401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.