Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26305829›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2015

Performance evaluation of the CHEMBIO DPP® (dual path platform) HIV-1/2 assay in early and established infections.

Silvina Masciotra, Krystin A Price, Patrick Sprinkle, Laura Wesolowski, S Michele Owen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Performance evaluation of four point-of-care HIV tests using unprocessed specimens.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Performance evaluation of the point-of-care INSTI™ HIV-1/2 antibody test in early and established HIV infections.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvina MasciotraDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: svm6@cdc.gov.
Krystin A PriceDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Patrick SprinkleDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Laura WesolowskiDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
S Michele OwenDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of more accurate point-of-care technology could increase the number of persons aware of their HIV status. The DPP(®) HIV-1/2 assay is the first dual path platform rapid test (RT) approved in the U.S. that also received the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) waiver for use with oral fluid and fingerstick and venous whole blood.

objectiveTo evaluate the performance of the DPP(®) HIV-1/2 assay with plasma specimens. STUDY

designSensitivity and specificity of the assay were calculated from 696 HIV-1 groups M (B and non-B subtypes) and O and HIV-2 (groups A and B) specimens and 505 HIV-negative specimens, respectively. Analysis of the assay performance in HIV-1 early infections was assessed by estimating the relative sensitivity of the RT before the Western blot (WB) becomes positive using a 50% cumulative frequency analysis and by comparing the reactivity with other Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved RTs.

resultsThe sensitivity for established infection was 100% for HIV-1 and 100% for HIV-2. The specificity was 100%. The DPP(®) HIV-1/2 assay performs similarly to most antibody-based RT approved by FDA in early HIV-1 infections.

conclusionsThe DPP(®) technology showed no significant improvement for detecting early infections over other lateral-flow RTs used in the U.S. Without more data on the DPP(®) HIV-1/2 assay, especially from whole blood and oral fluid specimens collected during the early phase of infection, its performance as point-of-care technology remains to be assessed.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticChromatography, AffinityEarly DiagnosisHIV-1HIV-2HIV InfectionsHumansReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUnited StatesReagent Kits, DiagnosticDiagnosticsDPPHIV-1/2Rapid test

Identifiers

PMID26305829
PMCPMC11105967
OpenAlexW1872321988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.