Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26305790›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Pelvic Belt Effects on Health Outcomes and Functional Parameters of Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Pain.

Niels Hammer, Robert Möbius, Stefan Schleifenbaum, Karl-Heinz Hammer, Stefan Klima, Justin S Lange, Odette Soisson, Dirk Winkler, Thomas L Milani

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02027038 (Pelvic Belt Effects on Osseous Anatomy, Muscule Activation and Ground Reaction Forces), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02027038 nacompletednot on this map

Pelvic Belt Effects on Osseous Anatomy, Muscule Activation and Ground Reaction Forces

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LeipzigRan2011 to 2013Enrolled42ConditionsSacroiliac Joint Pain, Helath Related Quality of Life, Electromuscular Activation of the Pelis and Limbs, Ground Reaction Force DataArmsPelvic belt application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Niels HammerInstitute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Robert MöbiusInstitute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Stefan SchleifenbaumDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinics of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Karl-Heinz HammerClinics for Orthopedics, Osteology and Pain Treatment, Kirchberg, Germany.
Stefan KlimaDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinics of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Justin S LangeInstitute of Applied Kinesiology, Department Human Locomotion, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
Odette SoissonDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinics of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Institute of Applied Kinesiology, Department Human Locomotion, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
Dirk WinklerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Clinics of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas L MilaniClinics for Orthopedics, Osteology and Pain Treatment, Kirchberg, Germany.
University Hospital Leipzig · DELeipzig University · DEChemnitz University of Technology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a common source of low back pain. However, clinical and functional signs and symptoms correlating with SIJ pain are widely unknown. Pelvic belts are routinely applied to treat SIJ pain but without sound evidence of their pain-relieving effects. This case-control study compares clinical and functional data of SIJ patients and healthy control subjects and evaluates belt effects on SIJ pain.

methods17 SIJ patients and 17 healthy controls were included in this prospective study. The short-form 36 survey and the numerical rating scale were used to characterize health-related quality of life in patients in a six-week follow-up and the pain-reducing effects of pelvic belts. Electromyography data were obtained from the gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, rectus femoris and medial vastus. Alterations of muscle activity, variability and gait patterns were compared in patients and controls along with the belts' effects in a dynamic setting when walking.

resultsSignificant improvements were observed in the short-form 36 survey of the SIJ patients, especially in the physical health subscores. Minor declines were also observed in the numerical rating scale on pain. Belt-related changes of muscle activity and variability were similar in patients and controls with one exception: the rectus femoris activity decreased significantly in patients with belt application when walking. Further belt effects include improved cadence and gait velocity in patients and controls.

conclusionsPelvic belts improve health-related quality of life and are potentially attributed to decreased SIJ-related pain. Belt effects include decreased rectus femoris activity in patients and improved postural steadiness during locomotion. Pelvic belts may therefore be considered as a cost-effective and low-risk treatment of SIJ pain.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02027038.

Indexed as

Orthopedic EquipmentAdultCase-Control StudiesElectromyographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPainPelvisSacroiliac JointTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26305790
PMCPMC4549265
OpenAlexW1873387774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.