ArticlePloS one2015
Improving Child Oral Health: Cost Analysis of a National Nursery Toothbrushing Programme.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Oral-Health Promotion in Dental Caries Prevention among Children: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Pooled it
- Exploring brushing and questionnaire data from a feasibility randomised control trial of a school-based smart, connected toothbrushing program.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Economic Evaluation of the Protecting Teeth @ 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.JDR clinical and translational research · 2023Trial
- Longitudinal Follow-up Survey of Effects of Oral Comprehensive Healthcare Measures on Early Childhood Caries.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2020Trial
- Four-level evaluation of health promotion intervention for preventing early childhood caries: a randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2017Trial
- Determinants of Oral Health System Effectiveness for Preschool Children in Decentralized Child Development Centres: A Cross-Sectional Study in Northeastern Thailand.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Contextual influences on school staff's motivation of implementing a school-based toothbrushing program in Taiwan: an action research study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Costs in dental care: a scoping review of methodologies and trends.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The Political Determinants of Oral Health Inequalities: Lessons in Policy Development and Implementation From Six Case Studies.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2025Review
- Supervised Toothbrushing Programmes: Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2025Article
- Oral Health Behaviour, Care Utilisation, and Barriers among Students with Disabilities: A Parental Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical Assessment of Plaque Removal Using a Novel Dentifrice Containing Cellulose Microfibrils.Dentistry journal · 2023Article
- The role of income and frequency of dental visits in the relationship between dental sealant use and resin fillings after extended coverage: a retrospective cohort study.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Health visiting teams and children's oral health: a scoping review.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a pilot school-based, toothbrushing programme.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Unlocking the potential of NHS primary care dental datasets.British dental journal · 2022Review
- Reorienting Oral Health Services to Prevention: Economic Perspectives.Journal of dental research · 2021Article
- Evaluation of a national complex oral health improvement programme: a population data linkage cohort study in Scotland.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Correlation of Caries Prevalence, Oral Health Behavior and Sweets Nutritional Habits among 10 to 19-Year-Old Cluj-Napoca Romanian Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Exploring the cost-effectiveness of child dental caries prevention programmes. Are we comparing apples and oranges?Evidence-based dentistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledDental caries is one of the most common diseases of childhood. The aim of this study was to compare the cost of providing the Scotland-wide nursery toothbrushing programme with associated National Health Service (NHS) cost savings from improvements in the dental health of five-year-old children: through avoided dental extractions, fillings and potential treatments for decay.
methodsEstimated costs of the nursery toothbrushing programme in 2011/12 were requested from all Scottish Health Boards. Unit costs of a filled, extracted and decayed primary tooth were calculated using verifiable sources of information. Total costs associated with dental treatments were estimated for the period from 1999/00 to 2009/10. These costs were based on the unit costs above and using the data of the National Dental Inspection Programme and then extrapolated to the population level. Expected cost savings were calculated for each of the subsequent years in comparison with the 2001/02 dental treatment costs. Population standardised analysis of hypothetical cohorts of 1000 children per deprivation category was performed.
resultsThe estimated cost of the nursery toothbrushing programme in Scotland was £1,762,621 per year. The estimated cost of dental treatments in the baseline year 2001/02 was £8,766,297, while in 2009/10 it was £4,035,200. In 2002/03 the costs of dental treatments increased by £213,380 (2.4%). In the following years the costs decreased dramatically with the estimated annual savings ranging from £1,217,255 in 2003/04 (13.9% of costs in 2001/02) to £4,731,097 in 2009/10 (54.0%). Population standardised analysis by deprivation groups showed that the largest decrease in modelled costs was for the most deprived cohort of children.
conclusionsThe NHS costs associated with the dental treatments for five-year-old children decreased over time. In the eighth year of the toothbrushing programme the expected savings were more than two and a half times the costs of the programme implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.