Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26305218›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Lymphangiogenic Markers and Their Impact on Nodal Metastasis and Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer--A Structured Review with Meta-Analysis.

Thomas K Kilvaer, Erna-Elise Paulsen, Sigurd M Hald, Tom Wilsgaard, Roy M Bremnes, Lill-Tove Busund, Tom Donnem

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neutrophils in tumor- and inflammation-induced lymphangiogenesis.International journal of biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Jin Fu Kang Oral Liquid Inhibits Lymphatic Endothelial Cells Formation and Migration.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas K KilvaerDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Erna-Elise PaulsenDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Sigurd M HaldInstitute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Tom WilsgaardDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Roy M BremnesDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Lill-Tove BusundDepartment of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway; Institute of Medical Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Tom DonnemDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), nodal metastasis is an adverse prognostic factor. Several mediating factors have been implied in the development of nodal metastases and investigated for predictive and prognostic properties in NSCLC. However, study results differ. In this structured review and meta-analysis we explore the published literature on commonly recognized pathways for molecular regulation of lymphatic metastasis in NSCLC.

methodsA structured PubMed search was conducted for papers reporting on the expression of known markers of lymhangiogenesis in NSCLC patients. Papers of sufficient quality, presenting survival and/or correlation data were included.

resultsHigh levels of vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C, HR 1.57 95% CI 1.34-1.84) and high lymphatic vascular density (LVD, HR 1.84 95% CI 1.18-2.87) were significant prognostic markers of poor survival and high expression of VEGF-C, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR3) and LVD was associated with lymph node metastasis in NSCLC.

conclusionLymphangiogenic markers are prognosticators of survival and correlate with lymph node metastasis in NSCLC. Their exact role and clinical implications should be further elucidated.

Indexed as

LymphangiogenesisBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisPublication BiasSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID26305218
PMCPMC4549062
OpenAlexW2168848895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.