Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26305188›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Molecular characterization of a selected cohort of patients affected by pulmonary metastases of malignant melanoma: Hints from BRAF, NRAS and EGFR evaluation.

Alessandra Ulivieri, Giuseppe Cardillo, Liborio Manente, Gregorino Paone, Andrea Petricca Mancuso, Leonardo Vigna, Enrico Di Stasio, Rita Gasbarra, Salvatore Girlando, Alvaro Leone

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. EMBO molecular medicine · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandra UlivieriAnatomic Pathology Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe CardilloThoracic Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy.
Liborio ManenteAnatomic Pathology Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy.
Gregorino PaoneDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy.
Andrea Petricca MancusoDepartment of Medical Oncology, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy.
Leonardo VignaDepartment of Medical Oncology, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy.
Enrico Di StasioInstitute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Rita GasbarraAnatomic Pathology Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore GirlandoAnatomic Pathology Unit, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.
Alvaro LeoneAnatomic Pathology Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy.
Carlo Forlanini Hospital · ITOspedale Santa Chiara · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelanoma is highly curable in early stages but holds devastating consequences in advanced phases with a median survival of 6-10 months. Lungs are a common metastasis target, but despite this, limited data are available on the molecular status of pulmonary lesions. MATERIALS AND

methods25 patients with surgically resected melanoma lung metastases were screened for BRAF, NRAS, CKIT and EGFR alterations. The results were correlated with time to lung metastasis (TLM), relapse-free survival after metastasectomy (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

resultsBRAF or NRAS were mutated in 52% and 20% of cases while CKIT was unaffected. Chromosome 7 polysomy was detected in 47% of cases with 17.5% showing EGFR amplification and concomitant BRAF mutation. NRAS mutated patients developed LM within 5 yrs from primary melanoma with larger lesions compared with BRAF (mean diameter 3.3 ± 2.2cm vs 1.9 ± 1.1cm, p = 0.2). NRAS was also associated with a shorter median RFS and OS after metastasectomy. Moreover, Cox regression analysis revealed that NRAS mutation was the only predictive factor of shorter survival from primary melanoma (p = 0.039, OR = 5.5 (1.1-27.6)).

conclusionsMolecular characterization identifies advanced melanoma subgroups with distinct prognosis and therapeutic options. The presence of NRAS mutation was associated to a worse disease evolution.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationMutationAdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAFEGFRmelanomaNRASPathologypulmonary metastases

Identifiers

PMID26305188
PMCPMC4637326
OpenAlexW1884813582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.