Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26304975›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2015

Enriching Patient-Centered Medical Homes Through Peer Support.

Timothy P Daaleman, Edwin B Fisher

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03294265 (A Peer Support Program to Enhance Treatment Adherence in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03294265 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Peer Support Program to Enhance Treatment Adherence in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador ZubiranRan2016 to 2018Enrolled500ConditionsType 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsPeer support sessions, Reminders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Community Health Worker Training Curricula and Intervention Outcomes in African American and Latinx Communities: A Systematic Review.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Peer-led oral health education model for elementary school-aged children in British Columbia, Canada.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Using peers to increase veterans' engagement in a smartphone application for unhealthy alcohol use: A pilot study of acceptability and utility.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Complementarity of Digital Health and Peer Support: "This Is What's Coming".Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Timothy P DaalemanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina tim_daaleman@med.unc.edu.
Edwin B FisherPeers for Progress, American Academy of Family Physicians Foundation, Leawood, Kansas Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer supporters are recognized by various designations-community health workers, promotores de salud, lay health advisers-and are community members who work for pay or as volunteers in association with health care systems or nonprofit community organizations and often share ethnicity, language, and socioeconomic status with the mentees that they serve. Although emerging evidence demonstrates the efficacy of peer support at the community level, the adoption and implementation of this resource into patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) is still under development. To accelerate that integration, this article addresses three major elements of peer support interventions: the functions and features of peer support, a framework and programmatic strategies for implementation, and fiscal models that would support the sustained viability of peer support programs within PCMHs. Key functions of peer support include assistance in daily management of health-related behaviors, social and emotional support, linkage to clinical care, and longitudinal or ongoing support. An organizational model of innovation implementation provides a useful framework for determining how to implement and evaluate peer support programs in PCMHs. Programmatic strategies that can be useful in developing peer support programs within PCMHs include peer coaching or mentoring, group self-management training, and programs designed around the telephone and information technology. Fiscal models for peer support programs include linkages with hospital or health care systems, service- or community-based nonprofit organizations, and partnerships between health care systems and community groups. Peer support promises to enrich PCMHs by activating patients in their self-care, providing culturally sensitive outreach, and opening the way for partnerships with community-based organizations.

Indexed as

Peer GroupSocial SupportCommunity Health WorkersCounselingHealth PromotionHumansModels, OrganizationalPatient-Centered CareProgram DevelopmentVolunteerscommunity health workermedical homepeer supportprimary care

Identifiers

PMID26304975
PMCPMC4648135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.