Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26303976›Full record

ReviewJournal of primary care & community health2016

Peers as Facilitators of Medication Adherence Interventions: A Review.

Maithe Enriquez, Vicki S Conn

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of primary care & community health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Peer Navigation for Smoking Cessation in People With HIV Who Smoke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Peers Keep It Real: Re-engaging Adults in HIV Care.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maithe EnriquezUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA enriquezm@missouri.edu.
Vicki S ConnUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Improve Medication AdherenceR01NR011990 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CONN, VICKI S · 2010 to 2013
$1.7M
Peers keep it real: reaching 100% adherence to HIV treatmentK01NR014409 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ENRIQUEZ, MAITHE · 2013 to 2015
$276k
NINR NIH HHS 5 K01 NR014409-03NINR NIH HHS K01 NR014409NINR NIH HHS R01 NR011990NINR NIH HHS R01NR011990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifficulty taking essential medications as prescribed is a prevalent problem among people living with chronic diseases. Numerous interventions to enhance medication adherence have been developed; the majority facilitated by health care professionals.

objectiveThis review examined medication adherence interventions delivered by peers (ie, lay individuals living with the same chronic disease) and reports what is known about the impact of peer-facilitated interventions. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Google, and PsychInfo, and ancestry searches. STUDY SELECTION: Solely peers delivered the intervention and follow-up occurred for at least 24 weeks postintervention. Electronic databases were searched from their start date to December 31, 2014.

resultsEleven studies were located that reported 10 different interventions focused on 6 chronic disease conditions. Most interventions were delivered in clinical settings and grounded in a theoretical framework. Formats were evenly split between individual and group level, with one intervention using both. Length of training for the interventionists and the number of intervention sessions that subjects received varied across studies. LIMITATIONS: Self-report was frequently used as a measure of adherence. Biomarkers were sometimes used to assess medication adherence; however, lifestyle modification may have also affected biomarker levels.

conclusionsOverall, the interventions had positive effects and attrition was quite low. Peer-facilitated interventions appear to enhance medication adherence as well as other healthful behaviors, such as exercise.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringPeer GroupChronic DiseaseFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaledisease managementhealth outcomesmedicationspatient-centerednessprimary care

Identifiers

PMID26303976
PMCPMC5695224
OpenAlexW1131590782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.