Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26303942›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2015

Complicating the dominant morality discourse: mothers and fathers' constructions of substance use during pregnancy and early parenthood.

Cecilia Benoit, Samantha Magnus, Rachel Phillips, Lenora Marcellus, Sinéad Charbonneau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Motherhood and Treatment Outcome in Female Patients with Compulsive Buying-Shopping Disorder.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Problematic substance use or problematic substance use policies?Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cecilia BenoitCentre for Addictions Research of BC and Department of Sociology, University of Victoria, PO Box 3050, Victoria, V8W3P5, BC, Canada. cbenoit@uvic.ca.
Samantha MagnusSchool of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, Victoria, V8W2Y2, BC, Canada. samagnus@uvic.ca.
Rachel PhillipsCentre for Addictions Research of BC, Centre for Addictions Research of BC, Victoria, Canada. rachelph@uvic.ca.
Lenora MarcellusSchool of Nursing, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, Victoria, V8W-2Y2, BC, Canada. lenoram@uvic.ca.
Sinéad CharbonneauFaculty of Law, University of Toronto, #1- 328 Arlington Ave, Toronto, M6C2Z9, ON, Canada. sinead.dearman@mail.utoronto.com.
University of Victoria · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConsumption of substances is a highly controversial behaviour, with those who do so commonly viewed as deviants, even criminals, or else as out of control addicts. In other work we showed that the use of substances by women who are pregnant or have recently become parents was mainly viewed by health and social care providers as morally wrong. Problematic substance use was framed through the narrow lens of gendered responsibilisation, resulting in women being seen primarily as foetal incubators and primary caregivers of infants.

methodsIn this follow-up paper we examine descriptive and qualitative data from a convenience sample of biological mothers and fathers (N = 34) recruited as part of a larger mixed methods study of the development and early implementation of an integrated primary maternity care program. We present a description of the participants' backgrounds, family circumstances, health status, and perception of drug-related stigma. This is succeeded by a thematic analysis of their personal views on substance use during both pregnancy and the transition to parenthood.

resultsOur results show that while many mothers and fathers hold abstinence as the ideal during pregnancy and early parenting, they simultaneously recognize the autonomy of women to judge substance use risk for themselves. Participants also call attention to social structural factors that increase/decrease harms associated with such substance use, and present an embodied knowledge of substance use based on their tacit knowledge of wellness and what causes harm.

conclusionsWhile these two main discourses brought forward by parents concerning the ideal of abstinence and the autonomy of women are not always reconcilable and are partially a reflection of the dissonance between dominant moral codes regarding motherhood and the lived experiences of people who use substances, service providers who are attuned to these competing discourses are likely to be more effective in their delivery of health and social services for vulnerable families. More holistic and nuanced perspectives of health, substance use, and parenting may generate ethical decision-making practice frameworks that guide providers in meeting and supporting the efforts of mothers and fathers to achieve well-being within their own definitions of problematic substance use.

Indexed as

Drug UsersHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMoralsPregnancyQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26303942
PMCPMC4548907
OpenAlexW2126170020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.