Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26303516›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Marine amoebae with cytoplasmic and perinuclear symbionts deeply branching in the Gammaproteobacteria.

Frederik Schulz, Tomáš Tyml, Ilaria Pizzetti, Iva Dyková, Stefano Fazi, Martin Kostka, Matthias Horn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Ecology and Evolution of Amoeba-Bacterium Interactions.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Entities inside one another - a matryoshka doll in biology?Environmental microbiology reports · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Frederik SchulzDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Sience, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Tomáš TymlFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Ilaria PizzettiWater Research Institute, National Research Council of Italy (IRSA-CNR), Via Salaria Km 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo - Roma, Italy.
Iva DykováDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic.
Stefano FaziWater Research Institute, National Research Council of Italy (IRSA-CNR), Via Salaria Km 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo - Roma, Italy.
Martin KostkaFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Matthias HornDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Sience, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Institute of Parasitology · CZUniversity of Vienna · ATMasaryk University · CZNational Research Council · ITWater Research Institute · IT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 1628European Research Council 281633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amoebae play an important ecological role as predators in microbial communities. They also serve as niche for bacterial replication, harbor endosymbiotic bacteria and have contributed to the evolution of major human pathogens. Despite their high diversity, marine amoebae and their association with bacteria are poorly understood. Here we describe the isolation and characterization of two novel marine amoebae together with their bacterial endosymbionts, tentatively named 'Candidatus Occultobacter vannellae' and 'Candidatus Nucleophilum amoebae'. While one amoeba strain is related to Vannella, a genus common in marine habitats, the other represents a novel lineage in the Amoebozoa. The endosymbionts showed only low similarity to known bacteria (85-88% 16S rRNA sequence similarity) but together with other uncultured marine bacteria form a sister clade to the Coxiellaceae. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization and transmission electron microscopy, identity and intracellular location of both symbionts were confirmed; one was replicating in host-derived vacuoles, whereas the other was located in the perinuclear space of its amoeba host. This study sheds for the first time light on a so far neglected group of protists and their bacterial symbionts. The newly isolated strains represent easily maintainable model systems and pave the way for further studies on marine associations between amoebae and bacterial symbionts.

Indexed as

AmoebaAquatic OrganismsCell NucleusCytoplasmGammaproteobacteriaSpecies SpecificitySymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID26303516
PMCPMC4642509
OpenAlexW1200470991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.