ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2015
Metabolic Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass or Sleeve Gastrectomy as Procedure of Choice?
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Five-year outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a primary procedure for morbid obesity: A prospective study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2017Article
- Physiological and molecular responses to bariatric surgery: markers or mechanisms underlying T2DM resolution?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2017Review
- Recent advances in metabolic and bariatric surgery.F1000Research · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, a marked increase in the relative use of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has occurred. However, long-term head-to-head comparison of the impact of this bariatric surgery (BS) procedure with the still considered "gold standard" Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is surprisingly low. The aim of this review manuscript is to appraise current evidence on the potential of GBP and SG as long-term therapeutic tool for subjects with T2DM. In our opinion, unfortunately, review of current literature does not allow to properly answer which of the two surgeries would be better as procedure of choice for subjects with T2DM. Arguably, the apparent superiority of GBP over SG could be overcome by the addition of a malabsortive component to SG in a staged approach restricted to those failing to achieve the desired metabolic outcomes. Nonetheless, whether this serves as basis for the election of SG as primary strategy for those with T2DM is questionable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.