Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26302761›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2015

Lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in head and neck cancer patients.

Chien-Chih Chen, Jin-Ching Lin, Kuan-Wen Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. High-risk lymph node ratio predicts worse prognosis in patients with locally advanced oral cancer.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2020
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Comparable Accuracy of Quantitative and Visual Analyses of [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. CT for estimating adequacy of lymph node dissection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Application of radiomics and machine learning in head and neck cancers.International journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chien-Chih ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No.1650, Sect. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan, Republic of China. chiencheh@gmail.com.
Jin-Ching LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No.1650, Sect. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan, Republic of China. jclin@vghtc.gov.tw.
Kuan-Wen ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No.1650, Sect. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan, Republic of China. kwchen@vghtc.gov.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymph node status is one prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) in head and neck cancer patients who received surgery plus postoperative chemoradiotherapy.

methodsFrom May 1991 to December 2012, a total of 117 head and neck cancer patients who received surgery plus postoperative chemoradiotherapy were analyzed. The primary sites were oral cavity (93), oropharynx (13), hypopharynx (6), and larynx (5). All patients had pathologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma and 63 patients had neck lymph nodes metastasis. LNR was calculated for each patient. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), local failure-free survival (LFFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).

resultsThe median follow up time was 36 months, with a range from 3.4 to 222 months. The 3-year rates of OS, LFFS, and DMFS were 59.7, 70.3, and 81.8%, respectively. The median value of LNR for lymph nodes positive patients was 0.1. In univariate analysis, patients with an LNR value less than 0.1 had better 3-year OS (67.0% vs.41.0%, p = 0.004), 3-year LFFS (76.1% vs. 54.9%, p = 0.015) and 3-year DMFS (87.2% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.06). Multivariate analysis revealed that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.367-6.242; p = 0.006) and LFFS (HR = 4.12; 95% CI = 1.604-10.59; p = 0.003).

conclusionLNR is an important prognosis factor for OS and LFFS in head and neck cancer patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID26302761
PMCPMC4554293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.