Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26302654›Full record

ArticleNeuropharmacology2015

Intravenous self-administration of entactogen-class stimulants in male rats.

Sophia A Vandewater, Kevin M Creehan, Michael A Taffe

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An updated review on synthetic cathinones.Archives of toxicology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Female rats self-administer heroin by vapor inhalation.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Lasting effects of repeated ∆British journal of pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophia A VandewaterCommittee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Kevin M CreehanCommittee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Michael A TaffeCommittee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: mtaffe@scripps.edu.
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Determinants of transition states in MDMA self-administrationR01DA024105 · NIDA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI TAFFE, MICHAEL A. · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intravenous self-administration (IVSA) of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is inconsistent in rats, with up to half of subjects failing to acquire reliable drug intake. It is unknown if this changes under long-access conditions (6 h sessions) under which the IVSA of cocaine and methamphetamine escalates. The entactogen class cathinone stimulants which exhibit MDMA-like monoamine effects in the nucleus accumbens, mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone) and methylone (3,4-methylenedioxymethcathinone), may support more reliable IVSA but results have been mixed. This study was designed to directly compare the IVSA of these three compounds. Groups of male Wistar rats were trained to self-administer mephedrone, methylone or MDMA (0.5 mg/kg/inf) under a Fixed-Ratio (FR) 1 schedule of reinforcement for 14 sessions. Following the acquisition interval, animals were evaluated in FR (0.0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5 mg/kg/inf) and Progressive Ratio (PR; 0.125, 1.0 mg/kg/inf) dose-substitution procedures. Long access conditions escalated MDMA intake over the 6 h session but not in the first 2 h. In short access, drug intake was significantly higher in mephedrone-trained rats compared with either the methylone-trained or MDMA-trained groups during acquisition. Mephedrone resulted in the highest intakes during FR and PR dose-substitution in MDMA- and mephedrone-trained groups. Overall it was found that mephedrone is a more effective reinforcer than methylone or MDMA and represents a higher risk for compulsive use.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAmphetamine-Related DisordersAnimalsCatheters, IndwellingCentral Nervous System StimulantsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleMaleMethamphetamineN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineRats, WistarSelf AdministrationSex CharacteristicsCentral Nervous System StimulantsmephedroneMethamphetaminemethyloneN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineBath saltsDrug addictionEcstasyRewardSubstance abuse

Identifiers

PMID26302654
PMCPMC4655153
OpenAlexW1187193514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.