Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26302374›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The Effect of Prenatal and Childhood Development on Hearing, Vision and Cognition in Adulthood.

Piers Dawes, Karen J Cruickshanks, David R Moore, Heather Fortnum, Mark Edmondson-Jones, Abby McCormack, Kevin J Munro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Size at birth and cognitive ability in late life: A systematic review.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Piers DawesSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Karen J CruickshanksPopulation Health Sciences and Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
David R MooreCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and Department of Otolaryngology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America; NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham, United Kingdom; MRC Institute of Hearing Research, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Heather FortnumNIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Mark Edmondson-JonesNIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Abby McCormackNIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham, United Kingdom; MRC Institute of Hearing Research, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Kevin J MunroSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Central Manchester Universities Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBMRC Institute of Hearing Research · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Medical Research Council MC_U135097130Wellcome Trust 093707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is unclear what the contribution of prenatal versus childhood development is for adult cognitive and sensory function and age-related decline in function. We examined hearing, vision and cognitive function in adulthood according to self-reported birth weight (an index of prenatal development) and adult height (an index of early childhood development). Subsets (N = 37,505 to 433,390) of the UK Biobank resource were analysed according to visual and hearing acuity, reaction time and fluid IQ. Sensory and cognitive performance was reassessed after ~4 years (N = 2,438 to 17,659). In statistical modelling including age, sex, socioeconomic status, educational level, smoking, maternal smoking and comorbid disease, adult height was positively associated with sensory and cognitive function (partial correlations; pr 0.05 to 0.12, p < 0.001). Within the normal range of birth weight (10th to 90th percentile), there was a positive association between birth weight and sensory and cognitive function (pr 0.06 to 0.14, p < 0.001). Neither adult height nor birth weight was associated with change in sensory or cognitive function. These results suggest that adverse prenatal and childhood experiences are a risk for poorer sensory and cognitive function and earlier development of sensory and cognitive impairment in adulthood. This finding could have significant implications for preventing sensory and cognitive impairment in older age.

Indexed as

AdultBirth WeightChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCognitionCognition DisordersFemaleHearingHumansMaleReaction TimeSensationUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26302374
PMCPMC4547702
OpenAlexW1632590295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.