Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26302336›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene2015

Exposure Estimation and Interpretation of Occupational Risk: Enhanced Information for the Occupational Risk Manager.

Martha Waters, Lauralynn McKernan, Andrew Maier, Michael Jayjock, Val Schaeffer, Lisa Brosseau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review and Improvement of Chemical Hazard Risk Management of Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Review of Workplace Based Aerosol Sampler Comparison Studies, 2004-2020.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  9. Occupational Health Hazards: Employer, Employee, and Labour Union Concerns.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martha Watersa Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Cincinnati , Ohio.
Lauralynn McKernanb Education and Information Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Cincinnati , Ohio.
Andrew Maierc Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati , Ohio.
Michael Jayjockd Jayjock and Associates, LLC , Langhorne , Pennsylvania.
Val Schaeffere Occupational Safety and Health Administration , Washington , DC.
Lisa Brosseauf Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , Illinois.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fundamental goal of this article is to describe, define, and analyze the components of the risk characterization process for occupational exposures. Current methods are described for the probabilistic characterization of exposure, including newer techniques that have increasing applications for assessing data from occupational exposure scenarios. In addition, since the probability of health effects reflects variability in the exposure estimate as well as the dose-response curve-the integrated considerations of variability surrounding both components of the risk characterization provide greater information to the occupational hygienist. Probabilistic tools provide a more informed view of exposure as compared to use of discrete point estimates for these inputs to the risk characterization process. Active use of such tools for exposure and risk assessment will lead to a scientifically supported worker health protection program. Understanding the bases for an occupational risk assessment, focusing on important sources of variability and uncertainty enables characterizing occupational risk in terms of a probability, rather than a binary decision of acceptable risk or unacceptable risk. A critical review of existing methods highlights several conclusions: (1) exposure estimates and the dose-response are impacted by both variability and uncertainty and a well-developed risk characterization reflects and communicates this consideration; (2) occupational risk is probabilistic in nature and most accurately considered as a distribution, not a point estimate; and (3) occupational hygienists have a variety of tools available to incorporate concepts of risk characterization into occupational health and practice.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansModels, StatisticalOccupational ExposureRisk AssessmentRisk ManagementUncertaintydose-response relationshipenvironmental variabilityexposure estimationexposure samplinghazard quotientoverexposure

Identifiers

PMID26302336
PMCPMC4685553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.