Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26302040›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2015

Sample size methods for estimating HIV incidence from cross-sectional surveys.

Jacob Konikoff, Ron Brookmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. HIV care coverage among HIV-positive adolescent girls and young women in South Africa: Results from the HERStory Study.South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacob KonikoffDepartment of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1772, U.S.A.
Ron BrookmeyerDepartment of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1772, U.S.A.

Funding

Laboratory and Statistical Development of Cross-Sectional HIV Incidence AssaysR01AI095068 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ESHLEMAN, SUSAN H · 2011 to 2021
$6.6M
BIOSTATISTICS TRAINING FOR AIDS RESEARCHT32AI007370 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WEISS, ROBERT ERIN · 1990 to 2014
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095068NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI095068NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI 007370NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding HIV incidence, the rate at which new infections occur in populations, is critical for tracking and surveillance of the epidemic. In this article, we derive methods for determining sample sizes for cross-sectional surveys to estimate incidence with sufficient precision. We further show how to specify sample sizes for two successive cross-sectional surveys to detect changes in incidence with adequate power. In these surveys biomarkers such as CD4 cell count, viral load, and recently developed serological assays are used to determine which individuals are in an early disease stage of infection. The total number of individuals in this stage, divided by the number of people who are uninfected, is used to approximate the incidence rate. Our methods account for uncertainty in the durations of time spent in the biomarker defined early disease stage. We find that failure to account for this uncertainty when designing surveys can lead to imprecise estimates of incidence and underpowered studies. We evaluated our sample size methods in simulations and found that they performed well in a variety of underlying epidemics. Code for implementing our methods in R is available with this article at the Biometrics website on Wiley Online Library.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiometryComputer SimulationCross-Sectional StudiesEpidemicsHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceModels, StatisticalPopulation SurveillanceSample SizeStatistical DistributionsCross-sectionalHIVIncidenceSample sizeTrends

Identifiers

PMID26302040
PMCPMC4715554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.