ArticleTranslational neurodegeneration2015
Clinical management and associated costs for moderate and severe Alzheimer's disease in urban China: a Delphi panel study.
Article in Translational neurodegeneration, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors associated with home care safety for older people with dementia: family caregivers' perspectives.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Alzheimer's Disease.Neurology and therapy · 2022Review
- Economic Burden and Management of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease in 8 European Countries: The BUILDup Delphi Consensus Study.Advances in therapy · 2021Article
- Urgent care for patients with dementia: a scoping review of associated factors and stakeholder experiences.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Analysis of Risk Factors for Cognitive Dysfunction in Disabled Elderly Patients in Chengdu, China.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Article
- The continuum of care for dementia: needs, resources and practice in China.Journal of global health · 2019Review
- Cross-cultural representations of dementia: an exploratory study.Journal of global health · 2019Article
- Economic burden for Alzheimer's disease in China from 2010 to 2050: a modelling study.Journal of market access & health policy · 2019Article
- The needs of informal caregivers and barriers of primary care workers toward dementia management in primary care: a qualitative study in Beijing.BMC family practice · 2018Article
- Challenges of Dementia Care in China.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- The impact of predisposing, enabling, and need factors in utilization of health services among rural residents in Guangxi, China.BMC health services research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare resource utilisation for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in China is not well understood. This Delphi panel study aimed to describe the clinical management pathways for moderate and severe AD patients in urban China and to define the amount and cost of healthcare resources used.
methodsA panel of 11 experts was recruited from urban China to participate in two rounds of preparatory interviews. In the first round, 9 physicians specialised in dementia gave a qualitative description of the clinical management of AD patients. In the second round, 2 hospital administrators were asked about the cost of AD management and care. Results from the interviews were discussed by the experts in a Delphi panel meeting, where consensus was reached on quantitative aspects of AD management, including the rate of healthcare resource utilisation, the respective unit costs and caregiving time.
resultsInterviewees reported that mild AD is under-recognised in China; most patients are diagnosed with moderate to severe AD. Loss of independence and agitation/aggression are the main drivers for healthcare resource utilisation and contribute to a heavier caregiver burden. It was estimated that 70 % moderate AD patients are independent/non-aggressive at the time of diagnosis, 15 % are independent/aggressive, 10 % are dependent/non-aggressive, and 5 % are dependent/aggressive. Dependent/aggressive AD patients are more likely to be hospitalised (70-90 %) than accepted in a nursing home (0-20 %), while the opposite is true for dependent/non-aggressive patients (5-35 % for hospitalisation vs. 80 % for nursing home). Independent AD patients require 1-3 hours/day of caregiver time, while dependent patients can require up to 12-15 hours/day. Experts agreed that AD complicates the management of age-related comorbidities, found in 70-80 % of all AD patients, increasing the frequency and cost of hospitalisation.
conclusionsThe Delphi panel approach was an efficient method of gathering data about the amount of healthcare resources used and associated costs for moderate and severe AD patients in urban China. The results of this study provide a useful source of information for decision makers to improve future healthcare policies and resource planning, as well as to perform economic evaluations of AD therapies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.