Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26300997›Full record

ArticleHereditary cancer in clinical practice2015

Next-generation sequencing for genetic testing of familial colorectal cancer syndromes.

Michele Simbolo, Andrea Mafficini, Marco Agostini, Corrado Pedrazzani, Chiara Bedin, Emanuele D Urso, Donato Nitti, Giona Turri, Maria Scardoni, Matteo Fassan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hereditary cancer in clinical practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Presumed Pathogenic Germ Line and Somatic Variants in African American Thyroid Cancer.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cancers · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Clinical Versatility of Next-Generation Sequencing in Colorectal Cancer.American journal of biomedical science & research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tumor suppressor genes in familial adenomatous polyposis.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2017
    Review
  13. Genetic Testing for Polyposis Syndromes.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michele SimboloARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Andrea MafficiniARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Marco AgostiniDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy ; Nano Inspired Biomedicine, Institute of Pediatric Research, Città della Speranza, Padua, Italy.
Corrado PedrazzaniDepartment of Surgery, General Surgery A, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Chiara BedinDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy ; Nano Inspired Biomedicine, Institute of Pediatric Research, Città della Speranza, Padua, Italy.
Emanuele D UrsoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Donato NittiDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Giona TurriDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Maria ScardoniDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Matteo FassanARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy ; ARC-Net Research Centre, Department of Pathology & Diagnostics, University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, Verona, Italy.
Aldo ScarpaARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy ; Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy ; ARC-Net Research Centre, Department of Pathology & Diagnostics, University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, Verona, Italy.
University of Padua · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic screening in families with high risk to develop colorectal cancer (CRC) prevents incurable disease and permits personalized therapeutic and follow-up strategies. The advancement of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies has revolutionized the throughput of DNA sequencing.

methodsA series of 16 probands for either familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP; 8 cases) or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; 8 cases) were investigated for intragenic mutations in five CRC familial syndromes-associated genes (APC, MUTYH, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6) applying both a custom multigene Ion AmpliSeq NGS panel and conventional Sanger sequencing.

resultsFourteen pathogenic variants were detected in 13/16 FAP/HNPCC probands (81.3 %); one FAP proband presented two co-existing pathogenic variants, one in APC and one in MUTYH. Thirteen of these 14 pathogenic variants were detected by both NGS and Sanger, while one MSH2 mutation (L280FfsX3) was identified only by Sanger sequencing. This is due to a limitation of the NGS approach in resolving sequences close or within homopolymeric stretches of DNA. To evaluate the performance of our NGS custom panel we assessed its capability to resolve the DNA sequences corresponding to 2225 pathogenic variants reported in the COSMIC database for APC, MUTYH, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6. Our NGS custom panel resolves the sequences where 2108 (94.7 %) of these variants occur. The remaining 117 mutations reside inside or in close proximity to homopolymer stretches; of these 27 (1.2 %) are imprecisely identified by the software but can be resolved by visual inspection of the region, while the remaining 90 variants (4.0 %) are blind spots. In summary, our custom panel would miss 4 % (90/2225) of pathogenic variants that would need a small set of Sanger sequencing reactions to be solved.

conclusionsThe multiplex NGS approach has the advantage of analyzing multiple genes in multiple samples simultaneously, requiring only a reduced number of Sanger sequences to resolve homopolymeric DNA regions not adequately assessed by NGS. The implementation of NGS approaches in routine diagnostics of familial CRC is cost-effective and significantly reduces diagnostic turnaround times.

Indexed as

Colorectal adenocarcinomaFAPHNPCCNext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID26300997
PMCPMC4546256
OpenAlexW2131376864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.