Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26300989›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2015

Dual EZH2 and EHMT2 histone methyltransferase inhibition increases biological efficacy in breast cancer cells.

Edward Curry, Ian Green, Nadine Chapman-Rothe, Elham Shamsaei, Sarah Kandil, Fanny L Cherblanc, Luke Payne, Emma Bell, Thota Ganesh, Nitipol Srimongkolpithak and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Edward CurryDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 ONN UK.
Ian GreenDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 ONN UK.
Nadine Chapman-RotheDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 ONN UK.
Elham ShamsaeiDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 ONN UK.
Sarah KandilDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 ONN UK.
Fanny L CherblancDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ UK.
Luke PayneDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 ONN UK.
Emma BellDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 ONN UK.
Thota GaneshDepartment of Pharmacology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA.
Nitipol SrimongkolpithakDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ UK.
Joachim CaronDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ UK.
Fengling LiStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7 Canada.
Anthony G UrenMRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 0NN UK.
James P SnyderDepartment of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA.
Masoud VedadiStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7 Canada.
Matthew J FuchterDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ UK.
Robert BrownDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 ONN UK ; Section of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, SM2 5NG UK.
Hammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBEmory University · USInstitute of Cancer Research · GBStructural Genomics Consortium · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13086Cancer Research UK 19435Medical Research Council MC_UP_A652_1001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany cancers show aberrant silencing of gene expression and overexpression of histone methyltransferases. The histone methyltransferases (HKMT) EZH2 and EHMT2 maintain the repressive chromatin histone methylation marks H3K27me and H3K9me, respectively, which are associated with transcriptional silencing. Although selective HKMT inhibitors reduce levels of individual repressive marks, removal of H3K27me3 by specific EZH2 inhibitors, for instance, may not be sufficient for inducing the expression of genes with multiple repressive marks.

resultsWe report that gene expression and inhibition of triple negative breast cancer cell growth (MDA-MB-231) are markedly increased when targeting both EZH2 and EHMT2, either by siRNA knockdown or pharmacological inhibition, rather than either enzyme independently. Indeed, expression of certain genes is only induced upon dual inhibition. We sought to identify compounds which showed evidence of dual EZH2 and EHMT2 inhibition. Using a cell-based assay, based on the substrate competitive EHMT2 inhibitor BIX01294, we have identified proof-of-concept compounds that induce re-expression of a subset of genes consistent with dual HKMT inhibition. Chromatin immunoprecipitation verified a decrease in silencing marks and an increase in permissive marks at the promoter and transcription start site of re-expressed genes, while Western analysis showed reduction in global levels of H3K27me3 and H3K9me3. The compounds inhibit growth in a panel of breast cancer and lymphoma cell lines with low to sub-micromolar IC50s. Biochemically, the compounds are substrate competitive inhibitors against both EZH2 and EHMT1/2.

conclusionsWe have demonstrated that dual inhibition of EZH2 and EHMT2 is more effective at eliciting biological responses of gene transcription and cancer cell growth inhibition compared to inhibition of single HKMTs, and we report the first dual EZH2-EHMT1/2 substrate competitive inhibitors that are functional in cells.

Identifiers

PMID26300989
PMCPMC4545913
OpenAlexW2159753430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.