ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015
Comparative analysis of root transcriptomes from two contrasting drought-responsive Williams 82 and DT2008 soybean cultivars under normal and dehydration conditions.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genes associated with translation and oxidative phosphorylation as components of the translational response in nodulated and water-restricted soybean.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Increased root growth and seed yield in transgenic soybean overexpressing NAC genes GmNAC19 and GmGRAB1.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
- Water deficit response in nodulated soybean roots: a comprehensive transcriptome and translatome network analysis.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of drought and salinity tolerance potentials of different soybean genotypes based upon physiological, biochemical, and genetic indicators.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Overexpression of soybeanFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Functional specialization of chloroplast vesiculation (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Towards Developing Drought-smart Soybeans.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Molecular Characterisation of Soybean Osmotins and Their Involvement in Drought Stress Response.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Biotechnological Perspectives of Omics and Genetic Engineering Methods in Alfalfa.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Differential gene expression in response to water deficit in leaf and root tissues of soybean genotypes with contrasting tolerance profiles.Genetics and molecular biology · 2020Article
- Comprehensive mapping of abiotic stress inputs into the soybean circadian clock.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Comprehensive Genomic Analysis and Expression Profiling of Diacylglycerol Kinase (International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of soybean primary root under varying water-deficit conditions.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Article
- Drought Stress Responses in Soybean Roots and Nodules.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The economically important DT2008 and the model Williams 82 (W82) soybean cultivars were reported to have differential drought-tolerant degree to dehydration and drought, which was associated with root trait. Here, we used 66K Affymetrix Soybean Array GeneChip to compare the root transcriptomes of DT2008 and W82 seedlings under normal, as well as mild (2 h treatment) and severe (10 h treatment) dehydration conditions. Out of the 38172 soybean genes annotated with high confidence, 822 (2.15%) and 632 (1.66%) genes showed altered expression by dehydration in W82 and DT2008 roots, respectively, suggesting that a larger machinery is required to be activated in the drought-sensitive W82 cultivar to cope with the stress. We also observed that long-term dehydration period induced expression change of more genes in soybean roots than the short-term one, independently of the genotypes. Furthermore, our data suggest that the higher drought tolerability of DT2008 might be attributed to the higher number of genes induced in DT2008 roots than in W82 roots by early dehydration, and to the expression changes of more genes triggered by short-term dehydration than those by prolonged dehydration in DT2008 roots vs. W82 roots. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that could be predicted to have a known function were further analyzed to gain a basic understanding on how soybean plants respond to dehydration for their survival. The higher drought tolerability of DT2008 vs. W82 might be attributed to differential expression in genes encoding osmoprotectant biosynthesis-, detoxification- or cell wall-related proteins, kinases, transcription factors and phosphatase 2C proteins. This research allowed us to identify genetic components that contribute to the improved drought tolerance of DT2008, as well as provide a useful genetic resource for in-depth functional analyses that ultimately leads to development of soybean cultivars with improved tolerance to drought.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.