Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26300874›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Comparative genomic analysis of multiple strains of two unusual plant pathogens: Pseudomonas corrugata and Pseudomonas mediterranea.

Emmanouil A Trantas, Grazia Licciardello, Nalvo F Almeida, Kamil Witek, Cinzia P Strano, Zane Duxbury, Filippos Ververidis, Dimitrios E Goumas, Jonathan D G Jones, David S Guttman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predicting Strain-Specific Metabolic Capabilities in the GenusComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Identification and genomic characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Draft genome sequence of active gold mine isolateMicrobiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative genomics of theMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Microorganisms · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Emmanouil A TrantasPlant Biochemistry and Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Agriculture, School of Agriculture and Food Technology, Technological Educational Institute of Crete Heraklion, Greece.
Grazia LicciardelloScience and Technology Park of Sicily Catania, Italy.
Nalvo F AlmeidaSchool of Computing, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul Campo Grande, Brazil.
Kamil WitekThe Sainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre Norwich, UK.
Cinzia P StranoDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania Catania, Italy.
Zane DuxburyThe Sainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre Norwich, UK.
Filippos VerveridisPlant Biochemistry and Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Agriculture, School of Agriculture and Food Technology, Technological Educational Institute of Crete Heraklion, Greece.
Dimitrios E GoumasPlant Biochemistry and Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Agriculture, School of Agriculture and Food Technology, Technological Educational Institute of Crete Heraklion, Greece ; Plant Pathology and Bacteriology Laboratory, Department of Agriculture, School of Agriculture and Food Technology, Technological Educational Institute of Crete Heraklion, Greece.
Jonathan D G JonesThe Sainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre Norwich, UK.
David S GuttmanCentre for the Analysis of Genome Evolution & Function, University of Toronto Toronto, ON, Canada.
Vittoria CataraDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania Catania, Italy.
Panagiotis F SarrisPlant Biochemistry and Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Agriculture, School of Agriculture and Food Technology, Technological Educational Institute of Crete Heraklion, Greece ; The Sainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre Norwich, UK.
Hellenic Mediterranean University · GRSainsbury Laboratory · GBUniversity of Catania · ITJohn Innes Centre · GBOsservatorio Astrofisico di Catania · ITUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The non-fluorescent pseudomonads, Pseudomonas corrugata (Pcor) and P. mediterranea (Pmed), are closely related species that cause pith necrosis, a disease of tomato that causes severe crop losses. However, they also show strong antagonistic effects against economically important pathogens, demonstrating their potential for utilization as biological control agents. In addition, their metabolic versatility makes them attractive for the production of commercial biomolecules and bioremediation. An extensive comparative genomics study is required to dissect the mechanisms that Pcor and Pmed employ to cause disease, prevent disease caused by other pathogens, and to mine their genomes for genes that encode proteins involved in commercially important chemical pathways. Here, we present the draft genomes of nine Pcor and Pmed strains from different geographical locations. This analysis covered significant genetic heterogeneity and allowed in-depth genomic comparison. All examined strains were able to trigger symptoms in tomato plants but not all induced a hypersensitive-like response in Nicotiana benthamiana. Genome-mining revealed the absence of type III secretion system and known type III effector-encoding genes from all examined Pcor and Pmed strains. The lack of a type III secretion system appears to be unique among the plant pathogenic pseudomonads. Several gene clusters coding for type VI secretion system were detected in all genomes. Genome-mining also revealed the presence of gene clusters for biosynthesis of siderophores, polyketides, non-ribosomal peptides, and hydrogen cyanide. A highly conserved quorum sensing system was detected in all strains, although species specific differences were observed. Our study provides the basis for in-depth investigations regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying virulence strategies in the battle between plants and microbes.

Indexed as

comparative genomicseffectorsnon-ribosomal peptidespith necrosispolyketidessiderophorestype III secretion systemtype VI secretion system

Identifiers

PMID26300874
PMCPMC4528175
OpenAlexW1581032682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.