Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26300633›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2015

Assessment of the risk of falling with the use of timed up and go test in the elderly with lower extremity osteoarthritis.

Ewa Zasadzka, Adrianna Maria Borowicz, Magdalena Roszak, Mariola Pawlaczyk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06329128 (Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Manual Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06329128 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Manual Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized Controlled Single-blind Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHasan Kalyoncu UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsExperimental: Study Group, Active Comparator: Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ewa ZasadzkaDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Karol Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Adrianna Maria BorowiczDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Karol Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Magdalena RoszakDepartment of Computer Science and Statistics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Mariola PawlaczykDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Karol Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalling in the elderly results in a significant number of admissions to hospitals and long-term care facilities, especially among patients with lower extremity osteoarthritis (OA).

objectiveThe aim of the study was to assess the risk of falling in adults older than 60 years with OA using timed up and go (TUG) test. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 187 patients (aged >60 years) were enrolled in the study. The assessment included: basic activities of daily living (ADLs), lower extremity strength with the use of the 30-second chair stand test (30 CST), and assessment of the risk of falling (TUG test). Pain intensity was evaluated with the numeric rating scale (NRS).

resultsThe TUG test results were significantly better in younger OA patients (aged 60-69 years), as compared with their older peers (aged 70-79 years; P<0.01) and the oldest group (aged >80 years; P<0.001). Also, the 30 CST results were significantly higher in younger OA patients (P<0.05). Subjects older than 80 years had a significantly worse ADL score (P<0.05 and P<0.001). Pain complaints were reported significantly more frequently by women than men (P<0.05). A correlation between age and the TUG test score (r=0.412; P<0.0004) as well as between the TUG test and the 30 CST scores (r=0.7368; P=0.000) was detected. In the group with the TUG test score of <13.5 seconds, the 30 CST (P<0.0001) and ADL (P<0.003) results were significantly better. A comparison of fallers vs nonfallers revealed that the number of falls was significantly higher in the group of subjects who scored ≥13.5 when compared to <13.5 (P=0.003). Fallers significantly more often reported pain (P<0.0001), whereas nonfallers had significantly better 30 CST results (P=0.0003).

conclusionElderly population with OA is at an elevated risk of falling, which increases with progressing age, pain, and muscle weakness. It seems prudent to identify individuals at a high risk of falling and to propose an adequate treatment for them.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesAccidental FallsActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthOsteoarthritisPainelderlyosteoarthritisrisk of falling

Identifiers

PMID26300633
PMCPMC4535541
OpenAlexW1488821076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.