Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26300001›Full record

ArticleOncogene2016

The putative oncogene CEP72 inhibits the mitotic function of BRCA1 and induces chromosomal instability.

S Lüddecke, N Ertych, A Stenzinger, W Weichert, T Beissbarth, J Dyczkowski, J Gaedcke, O Valerius, G H Braus, M Kschischo and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The p53/p73 - p21Oncogene · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. CHK2-BRCA1 tumor-suppressor axis restrains oncogenic Aurora-A kinase to ensure proper mitotic microtubule assembly.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

S LüddeckeSection for Cellular Oncology, Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB) and University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Institute of Molecular Oncology, Göttingen, Germany.
N ErtychSection for Cellular Oncology, Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB) and University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Institute of Molecular Oncology, Göttingen, Germany.
A StenzingerInstitute for Pathology, University Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany.
W WeichertInstitute for Pathology, University Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany.
T BeissbarthSection for Statistical Bioinformatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Institute of Medical Statistics, Göttingen, Germany.
J DyczkowskiSection for Statistical Bioinformatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Institute of Medical Statistics, Göttingen, Germany.
J GaedckeDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
O ValeriusDepartment for Molecular Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August University Göttingen, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Göttingen, Germany.
G H BrausDepartment for Molecular Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August University Göttingen, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Göttingen, Germany.
M KschischoDepartment of Mathematics and Technology, University of Applied Sciences Koblenz, Remagen, Germany.
H BastiansSection for Cellular Oncology, Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB) and University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Institute of Molecular Oncology, Göttingen, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEKoblenz University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRCA1 is a tumor-suppressor gene associated with, but not restricted to, breast and ovarian cancer and implicated in various biological functions. During mitosis, BRCA1 and its positive regulator Chk2 are localized at centrosomes and are required for the regulation of microtubule plus end assembly, thereby ensuring faithful mitosis and numerical chromosome stability. However, the function of BRCA1 during mitosis has not been defined mechanistically. To gain insights into the mitotic role of BRCA1 in regulating microtubule assembly, we systematically identified proteins interacting with BRCA1 during mitosis and found the centrosomal protein Cep72 as a novel BRCA1-interacting protein. CEP72 is frequently upregulated in colorectal cancer tissues and overexpression of CEP72 mirrors the consequences of BRCA1 loss during mitosis. In detail, the overexpression of CEP72 causes an increase in microtubule plus end assembly, abnormal mitotic spindle formation and the induction of chromosomal instability. Moreover, we show that high levels of Cep72 counteract Chk2 as a positive regulator of BRCA1 to ensure proper mitotic microtubule assembly. Thus, CEP72 represents a putative oncogene in colorectal cancer that might negatively regulate the mitotic function of BRCA1 to ensure chromosomal stability.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBase SequenceBRCA1 ProteinChromosomal InstabilityColorectal NeoplasmsHumansMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMitosisOncogenesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanCEP72 protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26300001
OpenAlexW2202265650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.