ArticleOncotarget2015
Evaluating blood levels of neuron specific enolase, chromogranin A, and circulating tumor cells as Merkel cell carcinoma biomarkers.
Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple Merkel cell carcinoma: a case report.Oxford medical case reports · 2023Article
- Pan-immune-inflammation value independently predicts disease recurrence in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Bespoke circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for treatment response in a refractory Merkel cell carcinoma patient.JAAD case reports · 2021Article
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma: New Trends.Cancers · 2021Review
- The Clinical Utility of Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) Serum Levels as a Biomarker for Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC).Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- The Potential Role of Liquid Biopsies in Advancing the Understanding of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Review
- Circulating Tumor Cell Detection and Polyomavirus Status in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor Cells in Asian Neuroendocrine Tumors.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- [Merkel cell carcinoma].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2019Article
- Circulating Cell-Free miR-375 as Surrogate Marker of Tumor Burden in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018Article
- Merkel cell carcinoma and cellular cytotoxicity: sensitivity to cellular lysis and screening for potential target antigens suitable for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2018Article
- Loss of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) in infiltrative basal cell carcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2018Article
- Chromogranin A as a valid marker in oncology: Clinical application or false hopes?World journal of methodology · 2017Review
- Merkel cell polyomavirus and cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma.Future science OA · 2016Article
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma Therapeutic Update.Current treatment options in oncology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer. Although used to monitor MCC patients, the clinical utility of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and chromogranin A (ChrA) blood levels is untested. EpCAM-positive circulating tumor cells (CTC) reflect disease status in several epithelial tumors. Here we investigate the use of NSE and ChrA blood levels and CTC counts as biomarkers for MCC disease behavior.
methodsNSE and ChrA blood levels from 60 patients with MCC were retrospectively analyzed; 30 patients were additionally screened for CTC. Biomarker values were correlated to clinical parameters.
resultsDespite routine use by some physicians, NSE and ChrA blood levels did not correlate with progression free survival, disease specific survival, or MCC recurrence. We found CTC in 97% of tested MCC patients. CTC counts were elevated in patients with active disease, suggesting their potential use in monitoring MCC.
conclusionsNSE and ChrA levels were not effective in predicting outcomes or detecting recurrences of MCC. In contrast, CTC counts have potential utility as a biomarker for MCC disease behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.