SynthesisClinical rheumatology2015
The evidence for immunotherapy in dermatomyositis and polymyositis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parkinson's disease-associated camptocormia: biopsy-confirmed focal myositis and treatment options.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Patient reported physical function, mental health, and treatment patterns in dermatomyositis: survey results from a cross-sectional study of adult dermatomyositis patients.BMC rheumatology · 2025Article
- Pharmacological Strategies in Dermatomyositis: Current Treatments and Future Directions.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Review
- Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Treatment of Dermatomyositis and Immune Mediated Necrotizing Myopathies: A Focused Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Factors Associated With Treatment Response in Patients With Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: A Registry-Based Study.Arthritis care & research · 2022Article
- Low dose intravenous immunoglobulin in addition to cyclophosphamide in systemic sclerosis : Single centre experience.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2021Observational
- The promise, perceptions, and pitfalls of immunoassays for autoantibody testing in myositis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2020Article
- Mortality of Chinese patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis.Clinical rheumatology · 2020Article
- Autoantibodies in myositis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2018Review
- The EuroMyositis registry: an international collaborative tool to facilitate myositis research.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2018Article
- Autoantibodies in juvenile-onset myositis: Their diagnostic value and associated clinical phenotype in a large UK cohort.Journal of autoimmunity · 2017Article
- Selected aspects of the current management of myositis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermatomyositis and polymyositis are rare chronic inflammatory disorders with significant associated morbidity and mortality despite treatment. High-dose corticosteroids in addition to other interventions such as immunosuppressants, immunomodulators, and more recently, biologics are commonly used in clinical practice; however, there are no clear guidelines directing their use. Our objective was to systematically review the evidence for immunotherapy in the treatment of dermatomyositis and polymyositis. Relevant studies were identified through Embase and PubMed database searches. Trials were selected using pre-determined selection criteria and then assessed for quality. Randomized controlled trials and experimental studies without true randomization and including adult patients with definite or probable dermatomyositis or polymyositis were evaluated. Any type of immunotherapy was considered. Clinical improvement, judged by assessment of muscle strength after 6 months, was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included IMACS definition of improvement, improvements in patient and physician global scores, physical function, and muscle enzymes. Twelve studies met eligibility criteria. Differences in trial design, quality, and variable reporting of baseline characteristics and outcomes made direct comparison impossible. Although no treatment can be recommended on the basis of this review, improved outcomes were demonstrated with a number of agents including methotrexate, azathioprine, ciclosporin, rituximab, and intravenous immunoglobulin. Plasmapheresis and leukapheresis were of no apparent benefit. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the role of immunosuppressive agents in the treatment of these conditions and the clinical context in which they are most likely to be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.