Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26298830›Full record

ReviewSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2016

Teaching medical anatomy: what is the role of imaging today?

Bruno Grignon, Guillaume Oldrini, Frédéric Walter

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bridging neuroradiology and neuroanatomy: NOWThe neuroradiology journal · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cranial Nerve Anatomy Using a Modular and Multimodal Radiologic Approach.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bruno GrignonDépartement d'Anatomie Faculté de Médecine Université de Lorraine, Service Imagerie Guilloz, CHU Nancy, 29 av de Lattre de Tassigny, 54035, Nancy Cedex, France. b.grignon@chu-nancy.fr.
Guillaume OldriniService de Radiologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.
Frédéric WalterService Imagerie Guilloz, CHU Nancy, Nancy Cedex, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedical anatomy instruction has been an important issue of debate for many years and imaging anatomy has become an increasingly important component in the field, the role of which has not yet been clearly defined. The aim of the paper was to assess the current deployment of medical imaging in the teaching of anatomy by means of a review of the literature. MATERIALS: A systematic search was performed using the electronic database PubMed, ScienceDirect and various publisher databases, with combinations of the relevant MeSH terms. A manual research was added.

resultsIn most academic curricula, imaging anatomy has been integrated as a part of anatomical education, taught using a very wide variety of strategies. Considerable variation in the time allocation, content and delivery of medical imaging in teaching human anatomy was identified. Given this considerable variation, an objective assessment remains quite difficult. DISCUSSION: In most publications, students' perceptions regarding anatomical courses including imaging anatomy were investigated by means of questionnaires and, regardless of the method of teaching, it was globally concluded that imaging anatomy enhanced the quality and efficiency of instruction in human anatomy. More objective evaluation based on an increase in students' performance on course examinations or on specific tests performed before and after teaching sessions showed positive results in numerous cases, while mixed results were also indicated by other studies.

conclusionA relative standardization could be useful in improving the teaching of imaging anatomy, to facilitate its assessment and reinforce its effectiveness.

Indexed as

AnatomyCurriculumDiagnostic ImagingDissectionEducation, MedicalHumansStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesAnatomyLearningMedical imagingRadiologic anatomyTeachingUndergraduate medicine education

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.