Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26298682›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2015

B-type natriuretic peptide as a parameter for pulmonary hypertension in children. A systematic review.

Chantal A Ten Kate, Dick Tibboel, Ulrike S Kraemer

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chantal A Ten KateIntensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Postbox 2060, Room Sk-3232, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. c.tenkate@erasmusmc.nl.
Dick TibboelIntensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Postbox 2060, Room Sk-3232, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. d.tibboel@erasmusmc.nl.
Ulrike S KraemerIntensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Postbox 2060, Room Sk-3232, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. u.kraemer@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPulmonary hypertension (PH) is a life-threatening disease with a high mortality rate and a broad variety of underlying etiologies. The current golden standard for diagnosing PH and monitoring efficiency of treatment is right heart catheterization. As an alternative, serum biomarkers have been suggested. Cardiac troponin T (TnT), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and NT-proBNP seem the most potential. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature on the prognostic value of these biomarkers in children with PH and their usefulness as a diagnostic tool. A systematic literature search yielded 14 studies on patients ≤18 years with proven PH with (NT-pro)BNP or TnT as primary outcome. TnT is suggested to be a promising biomarker, but its usefulness in clinical practice has not been proven. The levels of (NT-pro)BNP seemed to be reliable within one PH category, but differed significantly between categories. NT-proBNP showed a good correlation with mortality and might have a prognostic value.

conclusionThe lack of absolute levels makes (NT-pro)BNP unsuitable as a diagnostic marker, but in view of the relative changes, it could be used to monitor patients. Further investigation should explore differences in normal (NT-pro)BNP levels between the different categories of PH. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Pulmonary hypertension is a life-threatening disease. Diagnosis can be challenging in children; the current diagnostic options-right heart catheterization and echocardiography-are invasive and/or investigator-dependent procedures. • Biomarkers could be useful in this context because they are investigator independent and easy to obtain through blood samples. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its N-terminal cleavage product (NT-proBNP) seem to be the most promising. The value of these biomarkers in the diagnostic approach of PH has already been investigated in adults, with promising results. Pediatric studies are still scarce. What is new: • The levels of BNP and NT-proBNP in pediatric patients differ strongly between the different categories of PH. Within the same category, the levels are more or less equal. • The relative changes could render them a prognostic marker in the follow-up of a certain individual patient. At this moment there is not enough evidence to rely on BNP or NT-proBNP in clinical treatment of patients with PH.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PulmonaryBiomarkersChildGlobal HealthHumansNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsSeverity of Illness IndexSurvival RateBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Biological markersNatriuretic peptidePulmonary hypertensionTroponin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.