ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2015
GUCY2D mutations in a Chinese cohort with autosomal dominant cone or cone-rod dystrophies.
Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- AAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of 15 Affected Patients From 12 Japanese Families withTranslational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- Long term follow-up of a family withInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo report the results of the GUCY2D gene mutation analysis in a cohort of Chinese patients with cone or cone-rod dystrophies (COD or CORD) and to describe the clinical features observed in patients with molecularly confirmed COD or CORD.
methodsA total of 74 probands clinically diagnosed with COD or CORD were recruited for genetic analysis; these included 15 unrelated patients with a positive family history consistent with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance and 59 unrelated sporadic cases. All probands underwent ophthalmic examinations including best-corrected visual acuity, fundus examination, optical coherence tomography, and electroretinography. Genomic DNA was extracted from venous blood of all participants, and all coding exons and exon-intron boundaries of the GUCY2D gene were screened for mutations by PCR-based DNA sequencing. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and allele-specific PCR analysis were used to validate the substitution in all available family members.
resultsFour different GUCY2D missense mutations--three affected codon 838 and one affected codon 849--were identified in nine unrelated probands. Mutation p.R838H was identified in four probands, while both mutations p.R838C and p.R838P were found in two unrelated patients, and mutation p.T849A was found in one proband. The GUCY2D mutations were found in 47% of the patients (7/15) with autosomal dominant cone dystrophy. Patients with mutation p.R838P presented a relatively severe clinical phenotype.
conclusionThe GUCY2D mutations were frequent in Chinese families with autosomal dominant cone or cone-rod dystrophies. All mutations were found in exon 13, which should be given priority during mutation screening analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.