Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26298565›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2015

GUCY2D mutations in a Chinese cohort with autosomal dominant cone or cone-rod dystrophies.

Feng Jiang, Ke Xu, Xiaohui Zhang, Yue Xie, Fengge Bai, Yang Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Veterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. AAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Genes · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Long term follow-up of a family withInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Feng JiangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab., Hougou Lane 17, Chong Nei Street, Beijing, 100730, China.
Ke XuBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab., Hougou Lane 17, Chong Nei Street, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xiaohui ZhangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab., Hougou Lane 17, Chong Nei Street, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yue XieBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab., Hougou Lane 17, Chong Nei Street, Beijing, 100730, China.
Fengge BaiBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab., Hougou Lane 17, Chong Nei Street, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yang LiBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab., Hougou Lane 17, Chong Nei Street, Beijing, 100730, China. yilbio@163.com.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Tongren Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo report the results of the GUCY2D gene mutation analysis in a cohort of Chinese patients with cone or cone-rod dystrophies (COD or CORD) and to describe the clinical features observed in patients with molecularly confirmed COD or CORD.

methodsA total of 74 probands clinically diagnosed with COD or CORD were recruited for genetic analysis; these included 15 unrelated patients with a positive family history consistent with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance and 59 unrelated sporadic cases. All probands underwent ophthalmic examinations including best-corrected visual acuity, fundus examination, optical coherence tomography, and electroretinography. Genomic DNA was extracted from venous blood of all participants, and all coding exons and exon-intron boundaries of the GUCY2D gene were screened for mutations by PCR-based DNA sequencing. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and allele-specific PCR analysis were used to validate the substitution in all available family members.

resultsFour different GUCY2D missense mutations--three affected codon 838 and one affected codon 849--were identified in nine unrelated probands. Mutation p.R838H was identified in four probands, while both mutations p.R838C and p.R838P were found in two unrelated patients, and mutation p.T849A was found in one proband. The GUCY2D mutations were found in 47% of the patients (7/15) with autosomal dominant cone dystrophy. Patients with mutation p.R838P presented a relatively severe clinical phenotype.

conclusionThe GUCY2D mutations were frequent in Chinese families with autosomal dominant cone or cone-rod dystrophies. All mutations were found in exon 13, which should be given priority during mutation screening analysis.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseAdolescentAdultAsian PeopleChildChild, PreschoolDNA Mutational AnalysisElectroretinographyFemaleGuanylate CyclaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedPedigreePolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthGuanylate Cyclaseguanylate cyclase 1Receptors, Cell SurfaceAutosomal dominant cone or cone–rod dystrophiesGUCY2D geneMutation

Identifiers

PMID26298565
OpenAlexW1129016910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.