Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26298555›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2016

A clinical decision rule for the use of plain radiography in children after acute wrist injury: development and external validation of the Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules.

Annelie Slaar, Monique M J Walenkamp, Abdelali Bentohami, Mario Maas, Rick R van Rijn, Ewout W Steyerberg, L Cara Jager, Nico L Sosef, Romuald van Velde, Jan M Ultee and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Fracture sonography-review of literature and current recommendations.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Detecting scaphoid fractures in wrist injury: a clinical decision rule.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Annelie SlaarDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.slaar@amc.nl.
Monique M J WalenkampTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abdelali BentohamiTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mario MaasDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rick R van RijnDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L Cara JagerEmergency Department, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nico L SosefDepartment of Surgery, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Romuald van VeldeDepartment of Surgery, Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
Jan M UlteeDepartment of Surgery, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Carel GoslingsTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels W L SchepTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLSint Lucas Andreas Hospital · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NLTergooi · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn most hospitals, children with acute wrist trauma are routinely referred for radiography.

objectiveTo develop and validate a clinical decision rule to decide whether radiography in children with wrist trauma is required. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe prospectively developed and validated a clinical decision rule in two study populations. All children who presented in the emergency department of four hospitals with pain following wrist trauma were included and evaluated for 18 clinical variables. The outcome was a wrist fracture diagnosed by plain radiography.

resultsIncluded in the study were 787 children. The prediction model consisted of six variables: age, swelling of the distal radius, visible deformation, distal radius tender to palpation, anatomical snuffbox tender to palpation, and painful or abnormal supination. The model showed an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.83). The sensitivity and specificity were 95.9% and 37.3%, respectively. The use of this model would have resulted in a 22% absolute reduction of radiographic examinations. In a validation study, 7/170 fractures (4.1%, 95% CI: 1.7-8.3%) would have been missed using the decision model.

conclusionThe decision model may be a valuable tool to decide whether radiography in children after wrist trauma is required.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingPractice Guidelines as TopicAcute DiseaseAlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNetherlandsPediatricsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiographyChildClinical decision ruleDistal forearm fractureMulticenter prospective study designRadiographyTraumaWrist

Identifiers

PMID26298555
PMCPMC4706582
OpenAlexW1643039907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.