Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26298417›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2016

Performance of computer-based analysis using temporal subtraction to assess joint space narrowing progression in rheumatoid patients.

Shota Ichikawa, Tamotsu Kamishima, Kenneth Sutherland, Takanobu Okubo, Kou Katayama

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shota IchikawaGraduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, North 12 West 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan. shota-ichikawa@eis.hokudai.ac.jp.
Tamotsu KamishimaFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, North 12 West 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan. ktamotamo2@yahoo.co.jp.
Kenneth SutherlandGraduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North 15, West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan. kensuth@med.hokudai.ac.jp.
Takanobu OkuboKatayama Orthopedic Rheumatology Clinic, Toyooka13-4-5-17, Asahikawa, 078-8243, Japan. o-tysss-743211@kzf.biglobe.ne.jp.
Kou KatayamaKatayama Orthopedic Rheumatology Clinic, Toyooka13-4-5-17, Asahikawa, 078-8243, Japan. kou@kata-rheum.or.jp.
Hokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our computer-based method can detect the chronological change in joint space width between baseline and follow-up images as the joint space difference index (JSDI). The aim of this study was to verify the sensitivity and specificity of our computer-based method in assessment of joint space narrowing progression in rheumatoid patients. Twenty-seven patients (24 women and 3 men) with rheumatoid arthritis underwent radiography of the bilateral hand at baseline and at 1 year. The joint space narrowing (JSN) of a total of 252 metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints and 229 carpal joints was assessed by our computer-based method, setting the Sharp/van der Heijde method as the gold standard. We constructed a receiver operating characteristic curve by using the Sharp/van der Heijde method as the gold standard and set the optimal cutoff on JSDI for MCP, carpal, and MCP/carpal joints. We then calculated the sensitivity and specificity for each cutoff in assessment of JSN progression. At the most discriminant cutoff, the sensitivity and specificity of the computer-based method for MCP joints was 78.6 versus 85.3 %, respectively (AUC = 0.837; P < 0.001). Carpal joints revealed a lower sensitivity and specificity with 64.7 and 86.8 % (AUC = 0.775; P < 0.001). Furthermore, the sensitivity and specificity for MCP/carpal joints was 71.0 versus 83.6 %, respectively (AUC = 0.778; P < 0.001). The computer-based method presented a reliable assessment of JSN progression with high sensitivity and specificity and may be useful in follow-up assessment of the joint damage in rheumatoid patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDisease ProgressionFemaleHand JointsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexSoftwareAntirheumatic AgentsComputer-based joint space analysisJoint space narrowingRheumatoid arthritisTemporal subtraction

Identifiers

PMID26298417
OpenAlexW1636774722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.