ArticleExperimental brain research2015
Processing of visual information compromises the ability of older adults to control novel fine motor tasks.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large reaching datasets quantify the impact of age, sex/gender, and experience on motor control.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- The Role of Visual Performance in Fine Motor Skills.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Visual Information Processing in Older Adults: Force Control and Motor Unit Pool Modulation.Journal of motor behavior · 2024Article
- Influence of pedal characteristics on pedaling control and neural drive in older adults.European journal of applied physiology · 2023Article
- Examining modifications of execution strategies during a continuous task.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A Mobile App Directory of Occupational Therapists Who Provide Home Modifications: Development and Preliminary Usability Evaluation.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2020Article
- Visual information processing in older adults: reaction time and motor unit pool modulation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Learning new gait patterns: Age-related differences in skill acquisition and interlimb transfer.Experimental gerontology · 2018Article
- Visuospatial function predicts one-week motor skill retention in cognitively intact older adults.Neuroscience letters · 2018Article
- Force Steadiness During a Cognitively Challenging Motor Task Is Predicted by Executive Function in Older Adults.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- Altered visual strategies and attention are related to increased force fluctuations during a pinch grip task in older adults.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Memory-guided force control in healthy younger and older adults.Experimental brain research · 2017Article
- Aging affects postural tracking of complex visual motion cues.Experimental brain research · 2016Article
- Fatigue-induced adjustment in antagonist coactivation by old adults during a steadiness task.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2016Article
- Visuomotor Correction is a Robust Contributor to Force Variability During Index Finger Abduction by Older Adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2015Article
- Characteristics and Factors Linked to Declined Manual Dexterity in Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Women.Sage open agingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We performed two experiments to determine whether amplified motor output variability and compromised processing of visual information in older adults impair short-term adaptations when learning novel fine motor tasks. In Experiment 1, 12 young and 12 older adults underwent training to learn how to accurately trace a sinusoidal position target with abduction-adduction of their index finger. They performed 48 trials, which included 8 blocks of 6 trials (the last trial of each block was performed without visual feedback). Afterward, subjects received an interference task (watched a movie) for 60 min. We tested retention by asking subjects to perform the sinusoidal task (5 trials) with and without visual feedback. In Experiment 2, 12 young and 10 older adults traced the same sinusoidal position target with their index finger and ankle at three distinct visual angles (0.25°, 1° and 5.4°). In Experiment 1, the movement error and variability were greater for older adults during the visual feedback trials when compared with young adults. In contrast, during the no-vision trials, age-associated differences in movement error and variability were ameliorated. Short-term adaptations in learning the sinusoidal task were similar for young and older adults. In Experiment 2, lower amount of visual feedback minimized the age-associated differences in movement variability for both the index finger and ankle movements. We demonstrate that although short-term adaptations are similar for young and older adults, older adults do not process visual information as well as young adults and that compromises their ability to control novel fine motor tasks during acquisition, which could influence long-term retention and transfer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26298044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.