Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26298044›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2015

Processing of visual information compromises the ability of older adults to control novel fine motor tasks.

Harsimran S Baweja, MinHyuk Kwon, Tanya Onushko, David L Wright, Daniel M Corcos, Evangelos A Christou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Harsimran S BawejaSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
MinHyuk KwonDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-8205, USA.
Tanya OnushkoDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-8205, USA.
David L WrightDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Daniel M CorcosDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Evangelos A ChristouDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-8205, USA. eachristou@hhp.ufl.edu.

Funding

Aging and learning of novel fine motor tasksR01AG031769 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTOU, EVANGELOS A · 2008 to 2012
$1.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed two experiments to determine whether amplified motor output variability and compromised processing of visual information in older adults impair short-term adaptations when learning novel fine motor tasks. In Experiment 1, 12 young and 12 older adults underwent training to learn how to accurately trace a sinusoidal position target with abduction-adduction of their index finger. They performed 48 trials, which included 8 blocks of 6 trials (the last trial of each block was performed without visual feedback). Afterward, subjects received an interference task (watched a movie) for 60 min. We tested retention by asking subjects to perform the sinusoidal task (5 trials) with and without visual feedback. In Experiment 2, 12 young and 10 older adults traced the same sinusoidal position target with their index finger and ankle at three distinct visual angles (0.25°, 1° and 5.4°). In Experiment 1, the movement error and variability were greater for older adults during the visual feedback trials when compared with young adults. In contrast, during the no-vision trials, age-associated differences in movement error and variability were ameliorated. Short-term adaptations in learning the sinusoidal task were similar for young and older adults. In Experiment 2, lower amount of visual feedback minimized the age-associated differences in movement variability for both the index finger and ankle movements. We demonstrate that although short-term adaptations are similar for young and older adults, older adults do not process visual information as well as young adults and that compromises their ability to control novel fine motor tasks during acquisition, which could influence long-term retention and transfer.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAnkleFeedback, SensoryFemaleFingersHumansLearningMalePsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAgingVisual feedbackVisuomotor processing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.