Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26297792›Full record

ReviewJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2015

Donor Unrestricted T Cells: A Shared Human T Cell Response.

Ildiko Van Rhijn, D Branch Moody

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Vaccines · 2024
    Article
  10. Human CD4Immunology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. CD1a and skin T cells: a pathway for therapeutic intervention.Clinical and experimental dermatology · 2024
    Review
  14. OMIP-101: 27-color flow cytometry panel for immunophenotyping of major leukocyte populations in fixed whole blood.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Recognition and control ofFrontiers in tuberculosis · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ildiko Van RhijnDivision of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; and Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584CL Utrecht, the Netherlands i.vanrhijn@uu.nl.
D Branch MoodyDivision of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; and.

Funding

Metabolomics Core U19AI111224 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MURRAY, MEGAN B, RAYCHAUDHURI, SOUMYA · 2015 to 2021
$20.4M
T cell response to CDI-restricted lipids in tuberculosisR01AI049313 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MOODY, DAVID BRANCH · 2001 to 2025
$10.6M
CD1 Presentation of Self Lipids to Human T CellsR01AR048632 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MOODY, DAVID BRANCH · 2002 to 2024
$9.4M
CD1 autoreactive T cells in human inflammatory skin diseaseR37AR048632 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DAVID Branch MOODY · 2025 to 2026
$1.1M
NIAID NIH HHS AI049313NIAID NIH HHS AI111224NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049313NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI111224NIAMS NIH HHS AR048632NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR048632NIAMS NIH HHS R37 AR048632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The now-famous term "restriction" derived from experiments in which T cells from Donor A failed to recognize Ags presented by cells from Donor B. Restriction results from interdonor variation in MHC genes. Donor restriction dominates immunologists' thinking about the T cell response because it governs organ transplantation and hinders the discovery of disease-associated Ags. However, other T cells can be considered "donor unrestricted" because their targets, CD1a, CD1b, CD1c, CD1d, or MR1, are expressed in a similar form among all humans. A striking feature of donor unrestricted T cells is the expression of invariant TCRs with nearly species-wide distribution. In this article, we review new evidence that donor unrestricted T cells are common in humans. NKT cells, mucosa-associated invariant T cells, and germline-encoded mycolyl-reactive T cells operate outside of the familiar principles of the MHC system, providing a broader picture of T cell function and new opportunities for therapy.

Indexed as

Tissue DonorsAntigen PresentationAntigens, CD1Histocompatibility AntigensHumansModels, ImmunologicalNatural Killer T-CellsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesT-Lymphocyte SubsetsAntigens, CD1Histocompatibility AntigensReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID26297792
PMCPMC4549802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.