Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26297751›Full record

SynthesisJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2015

Best Practices for Ethical Sharing of Individual-Level Health Research Data From Low- and Middle-Income Settings.

Susan Bull, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Spencer Denny, Irene Jao, Vicki Marsh, Laura Merson, Neena Shah More, Le Nguyen Thanh Nhan, David Osrin, Decha Tangseefa and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Caribbean data-sharing initiatives: activities of the Eastern Caribbean Health Outcomes Research Network.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Solutions to COVID-19 data sharing.The Lancet. Digital health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Susan BullUniversity of Oxford, UK susan.bull@ethox.ox.ac.uk.
Phaik Yeong CheahUniversity of Oxford, UK Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Spencer DennyUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Irene JaoKEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Vicki MarshUniversity of Oxford, UK KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Laura MersonOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Neena Shah MoreSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.
Le Nguyen Thanh NhanChildren's Hospital 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
David OsrinUniversity College London, UK.
Decha TangseefaThammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Douglas WassenaarUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Michael ParkerUniversity of Oxford, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L016265/1Wellcome Trust 089276Wellcome Trust 091561Wellcome Trust 096527Wellcome Trust 100714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sharing individual-level data from clinical and public health research is increasingly being seen as a core requirement for effective and efficient biomedical research. This article discusses the results of a systematic review and multisite qualitative study of key stakeholders' perspectives on best practices in ethical data sharing in low- and middle-income settings. Our research suggests that for data sharing to be effective and sustainable, multiple social and ethical requirements need to be met. An effective model of data sharing will be one in which considered judgments will need to be made about how best to achieve scientific progress, minimize risks of harm, promote fairness and reciprocity, and build and sustain trust.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCooperative BehaviorDeveloping CountriesPublic HealthSocial ResponsibilityTrustData CollectionHumansIncomeInformation DisseminationPractice Guidelines as TopicResearch PersonnelResidence Characteristicsbiomedical research ethicsclinical researchdata releasedata sharinghealth policylow-income countriesmiddle-income countriesprivacyresearch dataresearch governancetrust

Identifiers

PMID26297751
PMCPMC4547207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.