Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26297750›Full record

ArticleJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2015

Developing Ethical Practices for Public Health Research Data Sharing in South Africa: The Views and Experiences From a Diverse Sample of Research Stakeholders.

Spencer G Denny, Blessing Silaigwana, Douglas Wassenaar, Susan Bull, Michael Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. African researchers do not think differently about Open Data.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomedical Data Sharing Among Researchers: A Study from Jordan.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Spencer G DennyUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Blessing SilaigwanaUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Douglas WassenaarUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa Wassenaar@ukzn.ac.za.
Susan BullUniversity of Oxford, UK.
Michael ParkerUniversity of Oxford, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 096527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The abundance of South African clinical and public health research data has the potential to unlock important and valuable future advances in biomedical science. Amid increasing calls for more effective sharing of individual-level data, commitment to promote access to research data is evident within South Africa's public research sector, but national guidance and regulation are absent. This qualitative study examined the perceptions, experiences and concerns of 32 research stakeholders about data-sharing practices. There was consensus about the utility of data sharing in publicly funded health research. However, disparate views emerged about the possible harms and benefits of sharing data and how these should be weighed. The relative dearth of policies governing data-sharing practices needs to be addressed and a framework of support developed that incentivizes data-sharing practices for researchers that are both ethical and effective.

Indexed as

AttitudeBiomedical ResearchCooperative BehaviorPublic HealthResearch PersonnelResidence CharacteristicsAdultAgedData CollectionDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInformation DisseminationMaleMiddle AgedPolicydata curationdata sharingpublic funded researchpublic healthresearch ethicsSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID26297750
PMCPMC4547312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.