Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26297447›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2015

Implementation of the HealthKick intervention in primary schools in low-income settings in the Western Cape Province, South Africa: a process evaluation.

Anniza de Villiers, Nelia P Steyn, Catherine E Draper, Jillian Hill, Lucinda Dalais, Jean Fourie, Carl Lombard, Gerhard Barkhuizen, Estelle V Lambert

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Childhood Obesity Prevention in Africa: A Systematic Review of Intervention Effectiveness and Implementation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anniza de VilliersNon-communicable Diseases Research Unit (NCDRU), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa. anniza.devilliers@mrc.ac.za.
Nelia P SteynDivision of Human Nutrition, University of Cape Town Medical Campus, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, South Africa. nelia.steyn@uct.ac.za.
Catherine E DraperDivision of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, PO Box 115, Newlands, 7725, South Africa. catherine.draper@uct.ac.za.
Jillian HillNon-communicable Diseases Research Unit (NCDRU), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa. jillian.hill@mrc.ac.za.
Lucinda DalaisDivision of Human Nutrition, University of Cape Town Medical Campus, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, South Africa. luc1_za@yahoo.com.
Jean FourieNon-communicable Diseases Research Unit (NCDRU), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa. jean.fourie@mrc.ac.za.
Carl LombardBiostatistics Unit, SAMRC, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa. carl.lombard@mrc.ac.za.
Gerhard BarkhuizenWestern Cape Education Department (WCED), Cape Town, South Africa. Gerhard.barkhuizen@westerncape.gov.za.
Estelle V LambertDivision of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, PO Box 115, Newlands, 7725, South Africa. vicki.lambert@uct.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe HealthKick intervention, introduced at eight primary schools in low-income settings in the Western Cape Province, South Africa, aimed to promote healthy lifestyles among learners, their families and school staff. Eight schools from similar settings without any active intervention served as controls.

methodsThe Action Planning Process (APP) guided school staff through a process that enabled them to assess areas for action; identify specific priorities; and set their own goals regarding nutrition and physical activity at their schools. Educators were introduced to the APP and trained to undertake this at their schools by holding workshops. Four action areas were covered, which included the school nutrition environment; physical activity and sport environment; staff health; and chronic disease and diabetes awareness. Intervention schools also received a toolkit comprising an educator's manual containing planning guides, printed resource materials and a container with physical activity equipment. To facilitate the APP, a champion was identified at each school to drive the APP and liaise with the project team. Over the three-years a record was kept of activities planned and those accomplished. At the end of the intervention, focus group discussions were held with school staff at each school to capture perceptions about the APP and intervention activities.

resultsOverall uptake of events offered by the research team was 65.6% in 2009, 75% in 2010 and 62.5% in 2011. Over the three-year intervention, the school food and nutrition environment action area scored the highest, with 55.5% of planned actions being undertaken. In the chronic disease and diabetes awareness area 54.2% actions were completed, while in the school physical activity and sport environment and staff health activity areas 25.9 and 20% were completed respectively. According to educators, the low level of implementation of APP activities was because of a lack of parental involvement, time and available resources, poor physical environment at schools and socio-economic considerations.

conclusionsThe implementation of the HealthKick intervention was not as successful as anticipated. Actions required for future interventions include increased parental involvement, greater support from the Department of Basic Education and assurance of sufficient motivation and 'buy-in' from schools.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeLife StylePovertyAwarenessChronic DiseaseDiabetes MellitusDietExerciseFamilyHealth PromotionHumansSchool Health ServicesSouth AfricaSports

Identifiers

PMID26297447
PMCPMC4546332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.