Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26297297›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2015

The remote brief intervention and referral to treatment model: Development, functionality, acceptability, and feasibility.

Edwin D Boudreaux, Brianna Haskins, Tina Harralson, Edward Bernstein

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05910580 (Improving Alcohol and Substance Use Care Access, Outcomes, and Equity During the Reproductive Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05910580 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Improving Alcohol and Substance Use Care Access, Outcomes, and Equity During the Reproductive Years: A Type 1 Hybrid Trial in Family Planning Clinics

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmory UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled400ConditionsAlcohol-Related Disorders, Substance-Related Disorders, Mental Health, Reproductive HealthArmsScreening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Payment and Financing for Substance Use Screening and Brief Intervention for Adolescents and Adults in Health, School, and Community Settings.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edwin D BoudreauxUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, USA. Electronic address: Edwin.Boudreaux@umassmed.edu.
Brianna HaskinsUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, USA. Electronic address: Brianna.Haskins@umassmed.edu.
Tina HarralsonPolaris Health Directions Inc., 565 E. Swedesford Rd. #200, Wayne, PA 19087, USA. Electronic address: tharralson@polarishealth.com.
Edward BernsteinBoston University School of Medicine, 77 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118, USA. Electronic address: Edward.Bernstein@bmc.org.

Funding

Remote Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment Service for Alcohol (R-BIRT)R42AA022035 · NIAAA · POLARIS HEALTH DIRECTIONS, INC. · PI BOUDREAUX, EDWIN D · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
The Remote Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment service for Alcohol (R-BIR41AA022035 · NIAAA · POLARIS HEALTH DIRECTIONS, INC. · PI BOUDREAUX, EDWIN D · 2012 to 2014
$340k
NIAAA NIH HHS R41 AA022035NIAAA NIH HHS R41AA022035NIAAA NIH HHS R42 AA022035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is effective for reducing risky alcohol use across a variety of medical settings. However, most programs have been unsustainable because of cost and time demands. Telehealth may alleviate on-site clinician burden. This exploratory study examines the feasibility of a new Remote Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (R-BIRT) model.

methodsEligible emergency department (ED) patients were enrolled into one of five models. (1) Warm Handoff: clinician-facilitated phone call during ED visit. (2) Patient Direct: patient-initiated call during visit. (3) Electronic Referral: patient contacted by R-BIRT personnel post visit. (4) Patient Choice: choice of models 1-3. (5) Modified Patient Choice: choice of models 1-2, Electronic Referral offered if 1-2 were declined. Once connected, a health coach offered assessment, counseling, and referral to treatment. Follow up assessments were conducted at 1 and 3 months. Primary outcomes measured were acceptance, satisfaction, and completion rates.

resultsOf 125 eligible patients, 50 were enrolled, for an acceptance rate of 40%. Feedback and satisfaction ratings were generally positive. Completion rates were 58% overall, with patients enrolled into a model wherein the consultation occurred during the ED visit, as opposed to after the visit, much more likely to complete a consultation, 90% vs. 10%, χ(2) (4, N=50)=34.8, p<0.001.

conclusionsThe R-BIRT offers a feasible alternative to in-person alcohol SBIRT and should be studied further. The public health impact of having accessible, sustainable, evidence-based SBIRT for substance use across a range of medical settings could be considerable.

Indexed as

CounselingProgram DevelopmentReferral and ConsultationAdultAlcohol DrinkingEmergency Service, HospitalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMotivational InterviewingPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionTelemedicineTime FactorsBrief motivational interventionReferralsScreeningSubstance abuseTechnologyTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID26297297
PMCPMC4624210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.