Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26297148›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general virology2015

Dynamics of virus shedding and antibody responses in influenza A virus-infected feral swine.

Hailiang Sun, Fred L Cunningham, Jillian Harris, Yifei Xu, Li-Ping Long, Katie Hanson-Dorr, John A Baroch, Paul Fioranelli, Mark W Lutman, Tao Li and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hailiang SunDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MI, USA.
Fred L CunninghamMississippi Field Station, National Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, US Department of Agriculture, Mississippi State, MI, USA.
Jillian HarrisDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MI, USA.
Yifei XuDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MI, USA.
Li-Ping LongDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MI, USA.
Katie Hanson-DorrMississippi Field Station, National Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, US Department of Agriculture, Mississippi State, MI, USA.
John A BarochNational Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, US Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Paul FioranelliMississippi Field Station, National Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, US Department of Agriculture, Mississippi State, MI, USA.
Mark W LutmanUS Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Tao LiViral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Kerri PedersenUS Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Brandon S SchmitNational Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, US Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Jim CooleyDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MI, USA.
Xiaoxu LinViral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Richard G JarmanViral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Thomas J DeLibertoNational Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, US Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Xiu-Feng WanDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MI, USA.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USMississippi State University · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

Zinc dependent conformational changes in AdcR and their impact on DNA bindingP20GM103646 · NIGMS · MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THIBAUDEAU, GISELLE · 2013 to 2022
$21.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103646NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given their free-ranging habits, feral swine could serve as reservoirs or spatially dynamic 'mixing vessels' for influenza A virus (IAV). To better understand virus shedding patterns and antibody response dynamics in the context of IAV surveillance amongst feral swine, we used IAV of feral swine origin to perform infection experiments. The virus was highly infectious and transmissible in feral swine, and virus shedding patterns and antibody response dynamics were similar to those in domestic swine. In the virus-inoculated and sentinel groups, virus shedding lasted ≤ 6 and ≤ 9 days, respectively. Antibody titres in inoculated swine peaked at 1 : 840 on day 11 post-inoculation (p.i.), remained there until 21 days p.i. and dropped to < 1 : 220 at 42 days p.i. Genomic sequencing identified changes in wildtype (WT) viruses and isolates from sentinel swine, most notably an amino acid divergence in nucleoprotein position 473. Using data from cell culture as a benchmark, sensitivity and specificity of a matrix gene-based quantitative reverse transcription-PCR method using nasal swab samples for detection of IAV in feral swine were 78.9 and 78.1 %, respectively. Using data from haemagglutination inhibition assays as a benchmark, sensitivity and specificity of an ELISA for detection of IAV-specific antibody were 95.4 and 95.0 %, respectively. Serological surveillance from 2009 to 2014 showed that ∼7.58 % of feral swine in the USA were positive for IAV. Our findings confirm the susceptibility of IAV infection and the high transmission ability of IAV amongst feral swine, and also suggest the need for continued surveillance of IAVs in feral swine populations.

Indexed as

Virus SheddingAnimalsAnimals, WildAntibodies, ViralInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsSwineSwine DiseasesAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID26297148
PMCPMC4857451
OpenAlexW1632021725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.