Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26296952›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2015

Safety and activity of RRx-001 in patients with advanced cancer: a first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 study.

Tony Reid, Bryan Oronsky, Jan Scicinski, Curt L Scribner, Susan J Knox, Shoucheng Ning, Donna M Peehl, Ron Korn, Meaghan Stirn, Corey A Carter and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01359982 (A Phase I, Open-Label, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of RRx-001 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas For Which There Are No Currently Accepted Curative Therapies), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01359982 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase I, Open-Label, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of RRx-001 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas For Which There Are No Currently Accepted Curative Therapies

TypeinterventionalSponsorEpicentRx, Inc.Ran2011 to 2015Enrolled26ConditionsMalignant Solid Tumor, LymphomasArmsRRx-001
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. A multidimensional pan-cancer analysis of CD47 and its role in promoting malignant phenotype in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. New Insights on NLRP3 Inflammasome: Mechanisms of Activation, Inhibition, and Epigenetic Regulation.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tony ReidMoores Cancer Center, University of California and San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: tonyreid@ucsd.edu.
Bryan OronskyEpicentRx, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Jan ScicinskiEpicentRx, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Curt L ScribnerRRD International, Rockville, MD, USA.
Susan J KnoxDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Shoucheng NingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Donna M PeehlDepartment of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ron KornImaging Endpoints, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Meaghan StirnEpicentRx, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Corey A CarterWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Arnold OronskyInterWest Partners, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Michael J TaylorNonClinical Safety Assessment, Mountain View, CA, USA.
William L FitchStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Pedro CabralesDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California and San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Michelle M KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Howard A BurrisSarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA.
Christopher D LaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Nacer E D AbroukInnovexe, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Gary R FangerEpicentRx, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Jeffrey R InfanteSarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA.
Stanford University · USTennessee Oncology · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

Attenuating the Oxidative and Myocardial Side-Effects of Acellular HemoglobinR01HL126945 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CABRALES, PEDRO, PALMER, ANDRE FRANCIS · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpigenetic alterations have been strongly associated with tumour formation and resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs, and epigenetic modifications are an attractive target in cancer research. RRx-001 is activated by hypoxia and induces the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species that can epigenetically modulate DNA methylation, histone deacetylation, and lysine demethylation. The aim of this phase 1 study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of RRx-001.

methodsIn this open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 study, we recruited adult patients (aged >18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced, malignant, incurable solid tumours from University of California at San Diego, CA, USA, and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA. Key eligibility criteria included evaluable disease, Eastern Cooperative Group performance status of 2 or less, an estimated life expectancy of at least 12 weeks, adequate laboratory parameters, discontinuation of all previous antineoplastic therapies at least 6 weeks before intervention, and no residual side-effects from previous therapies. Patients were assigned to receive intravenous infusions of RRx-001 at increasing doses (10 mg/m(2), 16·7 mg/m(2), 24·6 mg/m(2), 33 mg/m(2), 55 mg/m(2), and 83 mg/m(2)) either once or twice-weekly for at least 4 weeks, with at least three patients per dose cohort and allowing a 2-week observation period before dose escalation. Samples for safety and pharmacokinetics analysis, including standard chemistry and haematological panels, were taken on each treatment day. The primary objective was to assess safety, tolerability, and dose-limiting toxic effects of RRx-001, to determine single-dose pharmacokinetics, and to identify a recommended dose for phase 2 trials. All analyses were done per protocol. Accrual is complete and follow-up is still on-going. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01359982.

findingsBetween Oct 10, 2011, and March 18, 2013, we enrolled 25 patients and treated six patients in the 10 mg/m(2) cohort, three patients in the 16·7 mg/m(2) cohort, three patients in the 24·6 mg/m(2) cohort, four patients in the 33 mg/m(2) cohort, three patients in the 55 mg/m(2), and six patients in the 83 mg/m(2) cohort. Pain at the injection site, mostly grade 1 and grade 2, was the most common adverse event related to treatment, experienced by 21 (84%) patients. Other common drug-related adverse events included arm swelling or oedema (eight [32%] patients), and vein hardening (seven [28%] patients). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Time constraints related to management of infusion pain from RRx-001 resulted in a maximally feasible dose of 83 mg/m(2). Of the 21 evaluable patients, one (5%) patient had a partial response, 14 (67%) patients had stable disease, and six (29%) patients had progressive disease; all responses were across a variety of tumour types. Four patients who had received RRx-001 were subsequently rechallenged with a treatment that they had become refractory to; all four responded to the rechallenge.

interpretationRRx-001 is a well-tolerated novel compound without clinically significant toxic effects at the tested doses. Preliminary evidence of activity is promising and, on the basis of all findings, a dose of 16·7 mg/m(2) was recommended as the targeted dose for phase 2 trials.

fundingEpicentRx (formerly RadioRx).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAzetidinesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNitro CompoundsPrognosisTreatment OutcomeAzetidinesNitro CompoundsRRx-001

Identifiers

PMID26296952
OpenAlexW2126022863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.