ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2015
Safety and activity of RRx-001 in patients with advanced cancer: a first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 study.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01359982 (A Phase I, Open-Label, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of RRx-001 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas For Which There Are No Currently Accepted Curative Therapies), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I, Open-Label, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of RRx-001 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas For Which There Are No Currently Accepted Curative Therapies
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Results from a biomarker study to accompany a phase II trial of RRx-001 with reintroduced platinum-based chemotherapy in relapsed small cell carcinoma.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2021Trial
- Trial
- A multidimensional pan-cancer analysis of CD47 and its role in promoting malignant phenotype in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Rational design of alternative treatment options for radioresistant rectal cancer using patient-derived organoids.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Lost at SCLC: a review of potential platinum sensitizers.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2024Review
- The Cancer Antioxidant Regulation System in Therapeutic Resistance.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Development of pharmacological immunoregulatory anti-cancer therapeutics: current mechanistic studies and clinical opportunities.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Coumarin-Furoxan Hybrid Suppressed the Proliferation and Metastasis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Activating Mitochondrial Stress and Cell Apoptosis.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- New Insights on NLRP3 Inflammasome: Mechanisms of Activation, Inhibition, and Epigenetic Regulation.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2024Review
- The impact of nitric oxide on HER family post-translational modification and downstream signaling in cancer.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Data Management 101 for drug developers: A peek behind the curtain.Clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- RRx-001: a chimeric triple action NLRP3 inhibitor, Nrf2 inducer, and nitric oxide superagonist.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Phase 1 pilot study of RRx-001 + nivolumab in patients with advanced metastatic cancer (PRIMETIME).Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- miR‑382 inhibits breast cancer progression and metastasis by affecting the M2 polarization of tumor‑associated macrophages by targeting PGC‑1α.International journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Targeting the CD47-SIRPα Innate Immune Checkpoint to Potentiate Antibody Therapy in Cancer by Neutrophils.Cancers · 2022Review
- Clinical Course of Two Patients with COVID-19 Respiratory Failure After Administration of the Anticancer Small Molecule, RRx-001.International medical case reports journal · 2022Article
- Superficial Venous-Associated Inflammation from Direct IV Administration of RRx-001 in Rats.International journal of medical sciences · 2022Article
- Subset analysis of safety and efficacy in asian patients treated with RRx-001 across three clinical trials.American journal of cancer research · 2022Article
- Interference With Redox Homeostasis Through a G6PD-Targeting Self-Assembled Hydrogel for the Enhancement of Sonodynamic Therapy in Breast Cancer.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Article
- An RRx-001 Analogue With Potent Anti-NLRP3 Inflammasome Activity but Without High-Energy Nitro Functional Groups.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEpigenetic alterations have been strongly associated with tumour formation and resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs, and epigenetic modifications are an attractive target in cancer research. RRx-001 is activated by hypoxia and induces the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species that can epigenetically modulate DNA methylation, histone deacetylation, and lysine demethylation. The aim of this phase 1 study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of RRx-001.
methodsIn this open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 study, we recruited adult patients (aged >18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced, malignant, incurable solid tumours from University of California at San Diego, CA, USA, and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA. Key eligibility criteria included evaluable disease, Eastern Cooperative Group performance status of 2 or less, an estimated life expectancy of at least 12 weeks, adequate laboratory parameters, discontinuation of all previous antineoplastic therapies at least 6 weeks before intervention, and no residual side-effects from previous therapies. Patients were assigned to receive intravenous infusions of RRx-001 at increasing doses (10 mg/m(2), 16·7 mg/m(2), 24·6 mg/m(2), 33 mg/m(2), 55 mg/m(2), and 83 mg/m(2)) either once or twice-weekly for at least 4 weeks, with at least three patients per dose cohort and allowing a 2-week observation period before dose escalation. Samples for safety and pharmacokinetics analysis, including standard chemistry and haematological panels, were taken on each treatment day. The primary objective was to assess safety, tolerability, and dose-limiting toxic effects of RRx-001, to determine single-dose pharmacokinetics, and to identify a recommended dose for phase 2 trials. All analyses were done per protocol. Accrual is complete and follow-up is still on-going. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01359982.
findingsBetween Oct 10, 2011, and March 18, 2013, we enrolled 25 patients and treated six patients in the 10 mg/m(2) cohort, three patients in the 16·7 mg/m(2) cohort, three patients in the 24·6 mg/m(2) cohort, four patients in the 33 mg/m(2) cohort, three patients in the 55 mg/m(2), and six patients in the 83 mg/m(2) cohort. Pain at the injection site, mostly grade 1 and grade 2, was the most common adverse event related to treatment, experienced by 21 (84%) patients. Other common drug-related adverse events included arm swelling or oedema (eight [32%] patients), and vein hardening (seven [28%] patients). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Time constraints related to management of infusion pain from RRx-001 resulted in a maximally feasible dose of 83 mg/m(2). Of the 21 evaluable patients, one (5%) patient had a partial response, 14 (67%) patients had stable disease, and six (29%) patients had progressive disease; all responses were across a variety of tumour types. Four patients who had received RRx-001 were subsequently rechallenged with a treatment that they had become refractory to; all four responded to the rechallenge.
interpretationRRx-001 is a well-tolerated novel compound without clinically significant toxic effects at the tested doses. Preliminary evidence of activity is promising and, on the basis of all findings, a dose of 16·7 mg/m(2) was recommended as the targeted dose for phase 2 trials.
fundingEpicentRx (formerly RadioRx).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.