ArticlePublic health2015
Comparison of Infrared Thermal Detection Systems for mass fever screening in a tropical healthcare setting.
Article in Public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of age on comparative diagnostic accuracy of temporal artery thermometers and non-contact infrared thermometers for fever detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Graph-Tabular Latent Fusion for Non-Contact Body Temperature Prediction from Thermal Facial Landmarks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Calibrated and Non-calibrated Infrared Thermometer Versus Calibrated Digital Thermometer in Healthy Volunteers and Febrile Patients in a Tertiary Care Center in Central India.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Best Practices for Body Temperature Measurement with Infrared Thermography: External Factors Affecting Accuracy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Influence of Hospital Environmental Variables on Thermometric Measurements and Level of Concordance: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Temperature thresholds and screening of febrile people by non-contact measurement of the face using infrared thermography - A methodology proposal.Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research · 2022Article
- Is It Useful to Determine the Temperature of Children for COVID-19 Screening in the Dental Setting?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Infrared Thermography for Measuring Elevated Body Temperature: Clinical Accuracy, Calibration, and Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- On Analyzing Capnogram as a Novel Method for Screening COVID-19: A Review on Assessment Methods for COVID-19.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Feasibility and effectiveness of daily temperature screening to detect COVID-19 in a prospective cohort at a large public university.BMC public health · 2021Article
- An initial study on the agreement of body temperatures measured by infrared cameras and oral thermometry.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Infrared thermometer on the wall (iThermowall): An open source and 3-D print infrared thermometer for fever screening.HardwareX · 2021Article
- Noncontact Sensing of Contagion.Journal of imaging · 2021Review
- Performance of COVID-19 associated symptoms and temperature checking as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection.PloS one · 2021Article
- Use of handheld infrared thermometers in COVID-19 pandemic for mass screening: Understanding its implications through a case report.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
- Clinical evaluation of fever-screening thermography: impact of consensus guidelines and facial measurement location.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Article
- Investigation of the Impact of Infrared Sensors on Core Body Temperature Monitoring by Comparing Measurement Sites.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The non-contact handheld cutaneous infra-red thermometer for fever screening during the COVID-19 global emergency.The Journal of hospital infection · 2020Article
- Estimated effectiveness of symptom and risk screening to prevent the spread of COVID-19.eLife · 2020Article
- Estimated effectiveness of traveller screening to prevent international spread of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesFever screening systems, such as Infrared Thermal Detection Systems (ITDS), have been used for rapid identification of potential cases during respiratory disease outbreaks for public health management. ITDS detect a difference between the subject and ambient temperature, making deployment in hot climates more challenging. This study, conducted in Singapore, a tropical city, evaluates the accuracy of three different ITDS for fever detection compared with traditional oral thermometry and self-reporting in a clinical setting. STUDY
designThis study is a prospective operational evaluation conducted in the Singapore military on all personnel seeking medical care at a high-volume primary healthcare centre over a one week period in February 2014.
methodsThree ITDS, the STE Infrared Fever Screening System (IFSS), the Omnisense Sentry MKIII and the handheld Quick Shot Infrared Thermoscope HT-F03B, were evaluated. Temperature measurements were taken outside the healthcare centre, under a sheltered walkway and compared to oral temperature. Subjects were asked if they had fever.
resultsThere were 430 subjects screened, of whom 34 participants (7.9%) had confirmed fever, determined by oral thermometer measurement. The handheld infrared thermoscope had a very low sensitivity (29.4%), but a high specificity (96.8%). The STE ITDS had a moderate sensitivity (44.1%), but a very high specificity (99.1%). Self-reported fevers showed good sensitivity (88.2%) and specificity (93.9%). The sensitivity of the Omnisense ITDS (89.7%) was the highest among the three methods with good specificity (92.0%).
conclusionThe new generation Omnisense ITDS displayed a relatively high sensitivity and specificity for fever. Though it has a lower sensitivity, the old generation STE ITDS system showed a very high specificity. Self-reporting of fever was reliable. The handheld thermograph should not be used as a fever-screening tool under tropical conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.