Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26296758›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Campylobacter group II phage CP21 is the prototype of a new subgroup revealing a distinct modular genome organization and host specificity.

Claudia Jäckel, Jens A Hammerl, Jochen Reetz, Andrew M Kropinski, Stefan Hertwig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterization and application of a novelCurrent research in food science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Viruses · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The NovelViruses · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Properties of Two Broad Host Range Phages ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Isolation and Characterization of Group IIIFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Application of Bacteriophages to LimitFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Methods and protocols · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudia Jäckelᅟ, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany. claudia.jaeckel@bfr.bund.de.
Jens A Hammerlᅟ, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany. jens.hammerl@web.de.
Jochen Reetzᅟ, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany. jochen.reetz@bfr.bund.de.
Andrew M KropinskiDepartments of Food Science & Molecular and Cellular Biology & Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. kropinsk@queensu.ca.
Stefan Hertwigᅟ, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany. stefan.hertwig@bfr.bund.de.
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DEUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of phages is a promising tool to reduce the number of Campylobacter along the food chain. Besides the efficacy against a broad range of strains, phages have to be safe in terms of their genomes. Thus far, no genes with pathogenic potential (e.g., genes encoding virulence factors) have been detected in Campylobacter phages. However, preliminary studies suggested that the genomes of group II phages may be diverse and prone to genomic rearrangements.

resultsWe determined and analysed the genomic sequence (182,761 bp) of group II phage CP21 that is closely related to the already characterized group II phages CP220 and CPt10. The genomes of these phages are comprised of four modules separated by very similar repeat regions, some of which harbouring open reading frames (ORFs). Though, the arrangement of the modules and the location of some ORFs on the genomes are different in CP21 and in CP220/CPt10. In this work, a PCR system was established to study the modular genome organization of other group II phages demonstrating that they belong to different subgroups of the CP220-like virus genus, the prototypes of which are CP21 and CP220. The subgroups revealed different restriction patterns and, interestingly enough, also distinct host specificities, tail fiber proteins and tRNA genes. We additionally analysed the genome of group II phage vB_CcoM-IBB_35 (IBB_35) for which to date only five individual contigs could be determined. We show that the contigs represent modules linked by long repeat regions enclosing some yet not identified ORFs (e.g., for a head completion protein). The data suggest that IBB_35 is a member of the CP220 subgroup.

conclusionCampylobacter group II phages are diverse regarding their genome organization. Since all hitherto characterized group II phages contain numerous genes for transposases and homing endonucleases as well as similar repeat regions, it cannot be excluded that these phages are genetically unstable. To answer this question, further experiments and sequencing of more group II phages should be performed.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralBacteriophagesCampylobacterGene RearrangementHost SpecificityMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26296758
PMCPMC4546147
OpenAlexW1820579908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.