Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26296731›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Quantitative microbial ecology through stable isotope probing.

Bruce A Hungate, Rebecca L Mau, Egbert Schwartz, J Gregory Caporaso, Paul Dijkstra, Natasja van Gestel, Benjamin J Koch, Cindy M Liu, Theresa A McHugh, Jane C Marks and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 305 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Key role of moss in supplementing nitrogen for plant growth under warming in a permafrost ecosystem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A genomic view of Earth's biomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ecosystem consequences of a nitrogen-fixing proto-organelle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bruce A HungateCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA Bruce.Hungate@nau.edu.
Rebecca L MauCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Egbert SchwartzCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
J Gregory CaporasoCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA Center for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Paul DijkstraCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Natasja van GestelCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Benjamin J KochCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Cindy M LiuTranslational Genomics Research Center, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Theresa A McHughCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Jane C MarksCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Ember M MorrisseyCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Lance B PriceTranslational Genomics Research Center, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Northern Arizona University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMilken Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria grow and transform elements at different rates, and as yet, quantifying this variation in the environment is difficult. Determining isotope enrichment with fine taxonomic resolution after exposure to isotope tracers could help, but there are few suitable techniques. We propose a modification to stable isotope probing (SIP) that enables the isotopic composition of DNA from individual bacterial taxa after exposure to isotope tracers to be determined. In our modification, after isopycnic centrifugation, DNA is collected in multiple density fractions, and each fraction is sequenced separately. Taxon-specific density curves are produced for labeled and nonlabeled treatments, from which the shift in density for each individual taxon in response to isotope labeling is calculated. Expressing each taxon's density shift relative to that taxon's density measured without isotope enrichment accounts for the influence of nucleic acid composition on density and isolates the influence of isotope tracer assimilation. The shift in density translates quantitatively to isotopic enrichment. Because this revision to SIP allows quantitative measurements of isotope enrichment, we propose to call it quantitative stable isotope probing (qSIP). We demonstrated qSIP using soil incubations, in which soil bacteria exhibited strong taxonomic variations in (18)O and (13)C composition after exposure to [(18)O]water or [(13)C]glucose. The addition of glucose increased the assimilation of (18)O into DNA from [(18)O]water. However, the increase in (18)O assimilation was greater than expected based on utilization of glucose-derived carbon alone, because the addition of glucose indirectly stimulated bacteria to utilize other substrates for growth. This example illustrates the benefit of a quantitative approach to stable isotope probing.

Indexed as

BiotaEnvironmental MicrobiologyBacteriaCentrifugation, Density GradientDNA, BacterialIsotope LabelingSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID26296731
PMCPMC4592864
OpenAlexW2139309712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.