Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26296545›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a multi-center case-control study.

Cheng Li, Wei-Hong Zhao, Qian Zhu, Shu-Jun Cao, Hua Ping, Xiaowei Xi, Guo-Juan Qin, Ming-Xing Yan, Duo Zhang, Jun Qiu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China. downing@sjtu.edu.cn.
Wei-Hong ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China. weihong-zhao@hotmail.com.
Qian ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China. melodyqianzhu@126.com.
Shu-Jun CaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Songjiang Central Hospital, Shanghai, 201600, China. shujun-cao@163.com.
Hua PingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Songjiang Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai, 201620, China. pinghua661106@126.com.
Xiaowei XiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200080, China. xixiaowei1966@126.com.
Guo-Juan QinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Minhang Central Hospital, Shanghai, 201100, China. xiaoguo19711001@163.com.
Ming-Xing YanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China. yanxiaohei00000@163.com.
Duo ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China. zd621@hotmail.com.
Jun QiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China. qjchildren736@qq.com.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China. zhangjian_ipmch@sjtu.edu.cn.
International Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNMinhang District Central Hospital · CNShanghai Changning Maternity and Infant Health Hospital · CNShanghai First People's Hospital · CNSongjiang District Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEctopic pregnancy (EP) is the leading cause of maternal death during the first trimester of pregnancy. A better understanding of EP risk can help prevent its occurrence. We carried out a multi-center, large-sample, case-control study to evaluate the risk factors for EP in Shanghai, China.

methodsWomen who were diagnosed with EP (n = 2411) and women with intrauterine pregnancies (n = 2416) were recruited from five hospitals in Shanghai, China. Information regarding the sociodemographic characteristics; reproductive, gynecological and surgical history; and previous and current use of contraceptives was collected from all participants. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and adjusted for potential confounding factors via multivariate logistic regression analysis.

resultsThe study revealed that the risk of EP was associated with the traditional risk factors including previous EP (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.72, 95% CI: 1.83-4.05), previous Chlamydia trachomatis infection (Adjusted OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 2.64, 3.84), previous infertility (AOR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66-2.88), previous adnexal surgery (AOR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.49-2.93), previous appendectomy (AOR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.13-2.37), and previous use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) (AOR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.39-2.13). Additionally, EP risk was increased following the failure of most contraceptives used in the current cycle including IUDs (AOR = 16.43, 95% CI: 10.42-25.89), oral contraceptive pills (AOR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.16-7.86), levonorgestrel emergency contraception (AOR = 4.75, 95% CI: 3.79-5.96), and female sterilization (AOR = 4 .73, 95% CI: 1.04-21.52). Stratified analysis showed that in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was the main risk factor for EP in women with tubal infertility (AOR = 8.99, 95% CI: 1.98-40.84), although IVF-ET showed no association with EP in women with non-tubal infertility (AOR = 2.52, 95% CI: 0.14-44.67).

conclusionIn addition to the traditional risk factors, IVF-ET and current IUD use play dominant roles in the occurrence of EP. Attention should be given to women with tubal infertility who have undergone IVE-ET treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAppendectomyCase-Control StudiesChinaChlamydia InfectionsContraception, PostcoitalContraceptive AgentsEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfertility, FemaleIntrauterine DevicesLogistic ModelsMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID26296545
PMCPMC4546260
OpenAlexW1832048338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.