Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26296511›Full record

Trial reportNeurology2015

Perampanel for tonic-clonic seizures in idiopathic generalized epilepsy A randomized trial.

Jacqueline A French, Gregory L Krauss, Robert T Wechsler, Xue-Feng Wang, Bree DiVentura, Christian Brandt, Eugen Trinka, Terence J O'Brien, Antonio Laurenza, Anna Patten and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01393743 (A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Perampanel in Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures), which is not on this map. Cited by 139 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
21.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01393743 phase3completednot on this map

A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Perampanel in Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures

TypeinterventionalSponsorEisai Inc.Ran2011 to 2015Enrolled163ConditionsSeizure Disorder Generalized Tonic ClonicArmsPerampanel, Placebo comparator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 326 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Perampanel add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Bioequivalence of perampanel fine granules and tablets in healthy Japanese subjects.International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020
    Trial

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jacqueline A French
Gregory L Krauss
Robert T Wechsler
Xue-Feng Wang
Bree DiVentura
Christian Brandt
Eugen Trinka
Terence J O'Brien
Antonio Laurenza
Anna Patten
Francesco Bibbiani
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNEpilepsy Study Consortium · USEvangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld · DEJohns Hopkins Hospital · USElks Rehabilitation Hospital · USUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 12Austrian Science Fund FWF P 21636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with drug-resistant, primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures in idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE).

methodsIn this multicenter, double-blind study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01393743; funded by Eisai Inc.), patients 12 years or older with PGTC seizures and IGE were randomized to placebo or perampanel during a 4-week titration period (perampanel up titrated from 2 to 8 mg/d, or highest tolerated dose) and 13-week maintenance period. The primary endpoint was percent change in PGTC seizure frequency per 28 days (titration plus maintenance vs baseline). The key secondary endpoint (primary endpoint for European Union registration) was 50% PGTC seizure responder rate (patients achieving $50% reduction in PGTC seizure frequency; maintenance vs baseline). Treatment-emergent adverse events were monitored.

resultsOf 164 randomized patients, 162 comprised the full analysis set (placebo, 81; perampanel, 81). Compared with placebo, perampanel conferred a greater median percent change in PGTC seizure frequency per 28 days (238.4%vs 276.5%; p , 0.0001) and greater 50%PGTC seizure responder rate (39.5% vs 64.2%; p 5 0.0019). During maintenance, 12.3% of placebo treated patients and 30.9%of perampanel-treated patients achieved PGTC seizure freedom. For the safety analysis (placebo, 82; perampanel, 81), the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events with perampanel were dizziness (32.1%) and fatigue (14.8%).

conclusionsAdjunctive perampanel was well tolerated and improved control of drug-resistant PGTC seizures in patients with IGE. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that adjunctive perampanel reduces PGTC seizure frequency, compared with placebo, in patients with drug-resistant PGTC seizures in IGE.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticonvulsantsChildDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEpilepsy, GeneralizedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesPyridonesAnticonvulsantsNitrilesperampanelPyridones

Identifiers

PMID26296511
PMCPMC4567458
OpenAlexW1862220344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.