Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26296286›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2015

Strategies for optical control and simultaneous electrical readout of extended cortical circuits.

P Ledochowitsch, A Yazdan-Shahmorad, K E Bouchard, C Diaz-Botia, T L Hanson, J-W He, B A Seybold, E Olivero, E A K Phillips, T J Blanche and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Towards maximizing optical access through Smart Dura.Journal of neural engineering · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Demonstration of an Optimized Large-scale Optogenetic Cortical Interface for Non-human Primates.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

P LedochowitschThe UC Berkeley-UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, United States; The Center for Neural Engineering and Prostheses (CNEP), United States. Electronic address: peterl@alleninstitute.org.
A Yazdan-ShahmoradUCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, San Francisco, CA, United States; The Center for Neural Engineering and Prostheses (CNEP), United States.
K E BouchardUCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, San Francisco, CA, United States; LBNL, Life Sciences and Computational Research Divisions, Berkeley, CA, United States; The Center for Neural Engineering and Prostheses (CNEP), United States.
C Diaz-BotiaThe UC Berkeley-UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, United States; The Center for Neural Engineering and Prostheses (CNEP), United States.
T L HansonUCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, San Francisco, CA, United States; The Center for Neural Engineering and Prostheses (CNEP), United States.
J-W HeUCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, San Francisco, CA, United States; The Center for Neural Engineering and Prostheses (CNEP), United States.
B A SeyboldUCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, San Francisco, CA, United States; The Center for Neural Engineering and Prostheses (CNEP), United States.
E OliveroDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Berkeley, CA, United States.
E A K PhillipsUCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, San Francisco, CA, United States.
T J BlancheUC Berkeley-Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Berkeley, CA, United States.
C E SchreinerUCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, San Francisco, CA, United States; The Center for Neural Engineering and Prostheses (CNEP), United States.
A HasenstaubUCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, San Francisco, CA, United States.
E F ChangUCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, San Francisco, CA, United States; The Center for Neural Engineering and Prostheses (CNEP), United States.
P N SabesUCSF Center for Integrative Neuroscience, San Francisco, CA, United States; The Center for Neural Engineering and Prostheses (CNEP), United States.
M M MaharbizDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Berkeley, CA, United States; The Center for Neural Engineering and Prostheses (CNEP), United States.

Funding

FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF PRIMARY AUDITORY CORTEXR01DC002260 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHREINER, CHRISTOPH E. · 1995 to 2020
$9.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo dissect the intricate workings of neural circuits, it is essential to gain precise control over subsets of neurons while retaining the ability to monitor larger-scale circuit dynamics. This requires the ability to both evoke and record neural activity simultaneously with high spatial and temporal resolution. NEW

methodIn this paper we present approaches that address this need by combining micro-electrocorticography (μECoG) with optogenetics in ways that avoid photovoltaic artifacts.

resultsWe demonstrate that variations of this approach are broadly applicable across three commonly studied mammalian species - mouse, rat, and macaque monkey - and that the recorded μECoG signal shows complex spectral and spatio-temporal patterns in response to optical stimulation. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsWhile optogenetics provides the ability to excite or inhibit neural subpopulations in a targeted fashion, large-scale recording of resulting neural activity remains challenging. Recent advances in optical physiology, such as genetically encoded Ca(2+) indicators, are promising but currently do not allow simultaneous recordings from extended cortical areas due to limitations in optical imaging hardware.

conclusionsWe demonstrate techniques for the large-scale simultaneous interrogation of cortical circuits in three commonly used mammalian species.

Indexed as

AnimalsArtifactsAuditory PerceptionCerebral CortexComputer-Aided DesignElectric ImpedanceElectrocorticographyElectrodes, ImplantedEquipment DesignEvoked PotentialsMacaca mulattaMaleMice, TransgenicNeural InhibitionNeuronsOptogeneticsstannic oxideTin CompoundsAuditoryCranial windowECoGEpiduralMouseNHPOptogeneticsParvalbuminRat

Identifiers

PMID26296286
PMCPMC6284522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.